The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care: a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care : a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark. / Clark, Alice; Praetorius, Thim; Torok, Eszter; Hvidtfeldt, Ulla Arthur; Hasle, Peter; Rod, Naja Hulvej.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, 534, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Clark, A, Praetorius, T, Torok, E, Hvidtfeldt, UA, Hasle, P & Rod, NH 2021, 'The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care: a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark', BMC Health Services Research, vol. 21, no. 1, 534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06498-x

APA

Clark, A., Praetorius, T., Torok, E., Hvidtfeldt, U. A., Hasle, P., & Rod, N. H. (2021). The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care: a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), [534]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06498-x

Vancouver

Clark A, Praetorius T, Torok E, Hvidtfeldt UA, Hasle P, Rod NH. The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care: a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1). 534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06498-x

Author

Clark, Alice ; Praetorius, Thim ; Torok, Eszter ; Hvidtfeldt, Ulla Arthur ; Hasle, Peter ; Rod, Naja Hulvej. / The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care : a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2021 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{8d0b711c3d624d02a5fc52d5cc6a8fcd,
title = "The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care: a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark",
abstract = "Background: Decision-makers increasingly consider patient-reported outcomes as important measures of care quality. Studies on the importance of work-place social capital-a collective work-place resource-for the experience of care quality are lacking. We determined the association between the level of work-place social capital and patient-reported quality of care in 148 hospital sections in the Capital Region of Denmark.Methods: This cross-sectional study combined section-level social capital from 5205 health care professionals and 23,872 patient responses about care quality. Work-place social capital encompassed three dimensions: trust, justice and collaboration. Patient-reported quality of care was measured as: overall satisfaction, patient involvement, and medical errors. Linear regression analysis and generalized linear models assessed the mean differences in patient reported experience outcomes and the risk of belonging to the lowest tertile of care quality.Results: A higher level of work-place social capital (corresponding to the interquartile range) was associated with higher patient-reported satisfaction and inpatient and acute care patient involvement. The risk of a section belonging to the lowest tertile of patient involvement was lower in sections with higher social capital providing inpatient (RR = 0.39, 0.19-0.81 per IQR increase) and acute care (RR = 0.53, 0.31-0.89). Patient-reported errors were fewer in acute care sections with higher social capital (RR = 0.65, 0.43 to 0.99). The risk of being in the lowest tertile of patient-reported satisfaction was supported for acute care sections (RR = 0.47, 0.28-0.79).Conclusions: Although we found small absolute differences in the association between patient-reported experience measures and social capital, even a small upward shift in the distribution of social capital in the hospital sector would, at the population level, have a large positive impact on patients' care experience.",
keywords = "HEALTH-CARE, JOB-SATISFACTION, RELATIONAL COORDINATION, WORK-ENVIRONMENT, PERFORMANCE, NURSES, PROFESSIONALS, LEADERSHIP, BURNOUT, STAFF",
author = "Alice Clark and Thim Praetorius and Eszter Torok and Hvidtfeldt, {Ulla Arthur} and Peter Hasle and Rod, {Naja Hulvej}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-021-06498-x",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of work-place social capital in hospitals on patient-reported quality of care

T2 - a cohort study of 5205 employees and 23,872 patients in Denmark

AU - Clark, Alice

AU - Praetorius, Thim

AU - Torok, Eszter

AU - Hvidtfeldt, Ulla Arthur

AU - Hasle, Peter

AU - Rod, Naja Hulvej

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Decision-makers increasingly consider patient-reported outcomes as important measures of care quality. Studies on the importance of work-place social capital-a collective work-place resource-for the experience of care quality are lacking. We determined the association between the level of work-place social capital and patient-reported quality of care in 148 hospital sections in the Capital Region of Denmark.Methods: This cross-sectional study combined section-level social capital from 5205 health care professionals and 23,872 patient responses about care quality. Work-place social capital encompassed three dimensions: trust, justice and collaboration. Patient-reported quality of care was measured as: overall satisfaction, patient involvement, and medical errors. Linear regression analysis and generalized linear models assessed the mean differences in patient reported experience outcomes and the risk of belonging to the lowest tertile of care quality.Results: A higher level of work-place social capital (corresponding to the interquartile range) was associated with higher patient-reported satisfaction and inpatient and acute care patient involvement. The risk of a section belonging to the lowest tertile of patient involvement was lower in sections with higher social capital providing inpatient (RR = 0.39, 0.19-0.81 per IQR increase) and acute care (RR = 0.53, 0.31-0.89). Patient-reported errors were fewer in acute care sections with higher social capital (RR = 0.65, 0.43 to 0.99). The risk of being in the lowest tertile of patient-reported satisfaction was supported for acute care sections (RR = 0.47, 0.28-0.79).Conclusions: Although we found small absolute differences in the association between patient-reported experience measures and social capital, even a small upward shift in the distribution of social capital in the hospital sector would, at the population level, have a large positive impact on patients' care experience.

AB - Background: Decision-makers increasingly consider patient-reported outcomes as important measures of care quality. Studies on the importance of work-place social capital-a collective work-place resource-for the experience of care quality are lacking. We determined the association between the level of work-place social capital and patient-reported quality of care in 148 hospital sections in the Capital Region of Denmark.Methods: This cross-sectional study combined section-level social capital from 5205 health care professionals and 23,872 patient responses about care quality. Work-place social capital encompassed three dimensions: trust, justice and collaboration. Patient-reported quality of care was measured as: overall satisfaction, patient involvement, and medical errors. Linear regression analysis and generalized linear models assessed the mean differences in patient reported experience outcomes and the risk of belonging to the lowest tertile of care quality.Results: A higher level of work-place social capital (corresponding to the interquartile range) was associated with higher patient-reported satisfaction and inpatient and acute care patient involvement. The risk of a section belonging to the lowest tertile of patient involvement was lower in sections with higher social capital providing inpatient (RR = 0.39, 0.19-0.81 per IQR increase) and acute care (RR = 0.53, 0.31-0.89). Patient-reported errors were fewer in acute care sections with higher social capital (RR = 0.65, 0.43 to 0.99). The risk of being in the lowest tertile of patient-reported satisfaction was supported for acute care sections (RR = 0.47, 0.28-0.79).Conclusions: Although we found small absolute differences in the association between patient-reported experience measures and social capital, even a small upward shift in the distribution of social capital in the hospital sector would, at the population level, have a large positive impact on patients' care experience.

KW - HEALTH-CARE

KW - JOB-SATISFACTION

KW - RELATIONAL COORDINATION

KW - WORK-ENVIRONMENT

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - NURSES

KW - PROFESSIONALS

KW - LEADERSHIP

KW - BURNOUT

KW - STAFF

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-021-06498-x

DO - 10.1186/s12913-021-06498-x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34059059

VL - 21

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 534

ER -

ID: 272500016