Contributions of the Scandinavian Countries to the Development of Non-Animal Alternatives in Toxicology
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
Contributions of the Scandinavian Countries to the Development of Non-Animal Alternatives in Toxicology. / Forsby, Anna; Knudsen, Lisbeth E.; Tähti, Hanna.
The History of Alternative Test Methods in Toxicology. ed. / Michael Balls; Robert Combes; Andrew Worth. Academic Press, 2019. p. 47-58.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Contributions of the Scandinavian Countries to the Development of Non-Animal Alternatives in Toxicology
AU - Forsby, Anna
AU - Knudsen, Lisbeth E.
AU - Tähti, Hanna
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The development of cell methods for the toxicity evaluation of drugs and chemicals started in Scandinavia at the end of the 1970s. The pioneer in vitro toxicologist was Björn Ekwall (1940-2000), who published his basal cytotoxicity concept in 1983, and started the MEIC project in 1989, the first international project aiming to evaluate the competence of cell toxicity tests to predict human toxicity. The EU framework project, ACuteTox (2005-10), can be seen as a continuation of the MEIC study. Generally, the early use of in vitro methods in all Scandinavian countries initially began for cell toxicology and genotoxicology and then for neurotoxicology and other tissue-specific toxicities. The Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicity, established in 1983, played an important role, not only in gathering the MEIC participants, but also by encouraging other in vitro toxicologists from Scandinavia to meet at its annual workshops. The EU framework programmes, Oculotox in vitro, ACuteTox, ReproTect, Sens-it-iv and NanoTest, secured the place of research on alternative methods to replace animal experiments in Scandinavia. After the implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU, governmental measures have promoted research and education on alternative methods in various countries, but without providing sufficient resources, especially for Replacement.
AB - The development of cell methods for the toxicity evaluation of drugs and chemicals started in Scandinavia at the end of the 1970s. The pioneer in vitro toxicologist was Björn Ekwall (1940-2000), who published his basal cytotoxicity concept in 1983, and started the MEIC project in 1989, the first international project aiming to evaluate the competence of cell toxicity tests to predict human toxicity. The EU framework project, ACuteTox (2005-10), can be seen as a continuation of the MEIC study. Generally, the early use of in vitro methods in all Scandinavian countries initially began for cell toxicology and genotoxicology and then for neurotoxicology and other tissue-specific toxicities. The Scandinavian Society for Cell Toxicity, established in 1983, played an important role, not only in gathering the MEIC participants, but also by encouraging other in vitro toxicologists from Scandinavia to meet at its annual workshops. The EU framework programmes, Oculotox in vitro, ACuteTox, ReproTect, Sens-it-iv and NanoTest, secured the place of research on alternative methods to replace animal experiments in Scandinavia. After the implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU, governmental measures have promoted research and education on alternative methods in various countries, but without providing sufficient resources, especially for Replacement.
KW - ACuteTox
KW - BEMF
KW - Carcinogenicity
KW - Cell toxicology
KW - Genotoxicology
KW - MEIC
KW - Neurotoxicology
KW - ReproTect
KW - Sens-it-iv
KW - SSCT
U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-813697-3.00008-1
DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-813697-3.00008-1
M3 - Book chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85060327527
SN - 9780128136973
SP - 47
EP - 58
BT - The History of Alternative Test Methods in Toxicology
A2 - Balls, Michael
A2 - Combes, Robert
A2 - Worth, Andrew
PB - Academic Press
ER -
ID: 241413325