From indexical to symbolic case in Danish: A content analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

From indexical to symbolic case in Danish : A content analysis. / Heltoft, Lars.

In: Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics , Vol. 53, No. 2, 12.2021, p. 160-190.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Heltoft, L 2021, 'From indexical to symbolic case in Danish: A content analysis', Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics , vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 160-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474

APA

Heltoft, L. (2021). From indexical to symbolic case in Danish: A content analysis. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics , 53(2), 160-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474

Vancouver

Heltoft L. From indexical to symbolic case in Danish: A content analysis. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics . 2021 Dec;53(2):160-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474

Author

Heltoft, Lars. / From indexical to symbolic case in Danish : A content analysis. In: Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics . 2021 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 160-190.

Bibtex

@article{c37a7614f82a447d9b2184da731963f8,
title = "From indexical to symbolic case in Danish: A content analysis",
abstract = "In late Middle Danish, case was reduced to pronominal case, but in spite of this, Middle Danish case preserved features of a system typologically different from modern Danish. Case grammaticalised semantic roles, with considerable polysemy. Along with the transitivity system, Middle Danish preserved inactive (impersonal) constructions and the polysemy of the case forms was resolved according to construction type. Such a system is indexical in the sense that the case forms point to their predicate types as the locus from which their polysemy is resolved. From this stance, it makes sense to maintain a sharp distinction between predicational structure (argument(s) and predicate), grammatical relations (subject and object) and case paradigms. Inactive constructions do not have oblique subjects, but objects as their basic argument, and subjects are everywhere in the nominative case. So-called oblique subjects cannot be agents. In accordance with this claim by Jan Terje Faarlund, I propose an analysis of the grammaticalised semantic role systems of transitivity and inactivity. The rise of categorical sentence structure, including the alignment of subjecthood, status as the primaryargument, subject position and a kind of structural nominative case is a development of post-Reformation Danish.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Middle Danish; Modern Danish; case; semantic roles; index; symbol; argument structure; grammatical relations; inactive constructions; transitive constructions; paradigmatic structure",
author = "Lars Heltoft",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "160--190",
journal = "Acta Linguistica Hafniensia",
issn = "0374-0463",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From indexical to symbolic case in Danish

T2 - A content analysis

AU - Heltoft, Lars

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - In late Middle Danish, case was reduced to pronominal case, but in spite of this, Middle Danish case preserved features of a system typologically different from modern Danish. Case grammaticalised semantic roles, with considerable polysemy. Along with the transitivity system, Middle Danish preserved inactive (impersonal) constructions and the polysemy of the case forms was resolved according to construction type. Such a system is indexical in the sense that the case forms point to their predicate types as the locus from which their polysemy is resolved. From this stance, it makes sense to maintain a sharp distinction between predicational structure (argument(s) and predicate), grammatical relations (subject and object) and case paradigms. Inactive constructions do not have oblique subjects, but objects as their basic argument, and subjects are everywhere in the nominative case. So-called oblique subjects cannot be agents. In accordance with this claim by Jan Terje Faarlund, I propose an analysis of the grammaticalised semantic role systems of transitivity and inactivity. The rise of categorical sentence structure, including the alignment of subjecthood, status as the primaryargument, subject position and a kind of structural nominative case is a development of post-Reformation Danish.

AB - In late Middle Danish, case was reduced to pronominal case, but in spite of this, Middle Danish case preserved features of a system typologically different from modern Danish. Case grammaticalised semantic roles, with considerable polysemy. Along with the transitivity system, Middle Danish preserved inactive (impersonal) constructions and the polysemy of the case forms was resolved according to construction type. Such a system is indexical in the sense that the case forms point to their predicate types as the locus from which their polysemy is resolved. From this stance, it makes sense to maintain a sharp distinction between predicational structure (argument(s) and predicate), grammatical relations (subject and object) and case paradigms. Inactive constructions do not have oblique subjects, but objects as their basic argument, and subjects are everywhere in the nominative case. So-called oblique subjects cannot be agents. In accordance with this claim by Jan Terje Faarlund, I propose an analysis of the grammaticalised semantic role systems of transitivity and inactivity. The rise of categorical sentence structure, including the alignment of subjecthood, status as the primaryargument, subject position and a kind of structural nominative case is a development of post-Reformation Danish.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Middle Danish; Modern Danish; case; semantic roles; index; symbol; argument structure; grammatical relations; inactive constructions; transitive constructions; paradigmatic structure

U2 - 10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474

DO - 10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 160

EP - 190

JO - Acta Linguistica Hafniensia

JF - Acta Linguistica Hafniensia

SN - 0374-0463

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 253195601