Mental health trajectories after juridical divorce: Does personality matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 259 KB, PDF document

Introduction This study investigated whether the Big Five personality dimensions were associated with mental health trajectories and/or intervention effects of a digital divorce intervention from juridical divorce to 12 months following juridical divorce. The study utilized a randomized controlled trial study design (N = 676) and measured mental health outcomes (anxiety, depression, somatization, and stress) at study inclusion (i.e., at juridical divorce) and 3-, 6-, and 12 months after juridical divorce. Big Five personality dimensions were measured 1 month post study inclusion. Results The study found that neuroticism is the personality dimension most predictive of post-divorce mental health outcomes. Specifically, divorcees with higher neuroticism scores indicated worse mental health immediately following divorce, but their symptom levels decreased more rapidly over a 12 months period after juridical divorce compared with lower neuroticism divorcees. It is also notable that their mean scores for the mental health outcomes remained higher at all time points (3, 6, and 12 months post baseline), relative to those lower in neuroticism. Conclusion Findings are discussed in light of divorce-adjustment-theory and the stress-buffering model.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume91
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)426-440
Number of pages15
ISSN0022-3506
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Research areas

  • anxiety, big five personality, depression, divorce, somatization, stress, MAJOR LIFE EVENTS, MODERATE REACTION, DEPRESSION, TRAITS, ADAPTATION, STRESS, STABILITY, MODELS, SATISFACTION, INDIVIDUALS

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 312188941