Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing. / Rasmussen, Jesper; Nielsen, Helle Højland; Gundersen, Hanne.

In: Weed Science, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2009, p. 338-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rasmussen, J, Nielsen, HH & Gundersen, H 2009, 'Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing', Weed Science, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 338-345. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-08-109.1

APA

Rasmussen, J., Nielsen, H. H., & Gundersen, H. (2009). Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing. Weed Science, 57(3), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-08-109.1

Vancouver

Rasmussen J, Nielsen HH, Gundersen H. Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing. Weed Science. 2009;57(3):338-345. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-08-109.1

Author

Rasmussen, Jesper ; Nielsen, Helle Højland ; Gundersen, Hanne. / Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing. In: Weed Science. 2009 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 338-345.

Bibtex

@article{9c3519c0408411de87b8000ea68e967b,
title = "Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing",
abstract = "POST weed harrowing and other cultivation methods to control weeds in early crop growth stages may result in crop damage due to low selectivity between crop and weeds. Crop tolerance to cultivation plays an important role but it has not been clearly defined and analyzed. We introduce a procedure for analyzing crop tolerance on the basis of digital image analysis. Crop tolerance is defined as the ability of the crop to avoid yield loss from cultivation in the absence of weeds, and it has two components: resistance and recovery. Resistance is the ability of the crop to resist soil covering and recovery is the ability to recover from it. Soil covering is the percentage of the crop that has been buried because of cultivation. We analyzed data from six field experiments, four experiments with species of small grains, barley, oat, wheat, and triticale, and two experiments with barley cultivars with different abilities to suppress weeds. The order of species' tolerance to weed harrowing was triticale>wheat>barley>oat and the differences were mainly caused by different abilities to recover from soil covering. At 25{\%} soil covering, grain yield loss in triticale was 0.5{\%}, in wheat 2.5{\%}, in barley 3.7{\%}, and in oat 6.5{\%}. Tolerance, resistance, and recovery, however, were influenced by year, especially for oat and barley. There was no evidence of differences between barley cultivars in terms of tolerance indicating that differences among species are more important than differences among cultivars. Selectivity analysis made it possible to calculate the crop yield loss due to crop damage associated with a certain percentage of weed control. In triticale, 80{\%} weed control was associated with 22{\%} crop soil cover on average, which reduced grain yield 0.4{\%} on average in the absence of weeds. Corresponding values for wheat, barley, and oat were 23, 21, and 20{\%} crop soil cover and 2.3, 3.6, and 5.1{\%} grain yield loss.",
keywords = "BRIC, Mechanical Weed Control, Physical Weed Control, Cultivation, Tillage",
author = "Jesper Rasmussen and Nielsen, {Helle H{\o}jland} and Hanne Gundersen",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1614/WS-08-109.1",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "338--345",
journal = "Weed Science",
issn = "0043-1745",
publisher = "Weed Science Society of America",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tolerance and selectivity of cereal species and cultivars to postemergence weed harrowing

AU - Rasmussen, Jesper

AU - Nielsen, Helle Højland

AU - Gundersen, Hanne

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - POST weed harrowing and other cultivation methods to control weeds in early crop growth stages may result in crop damage due to low selectivity between crop and weeds. Crop tolerance to cultivation plays an important role but it has not been clearly defined and analyzed. We introduce a procedure for analyzing crop tolerance on the basis of digital image analysis. Crop tolerance is defined as the ability of the crop to avoid yield loss from cultivation in the absence of weeds, and it has two components: resistance and recovery. Resistance is the ability of the crop to resist soil covering and recovery is the ability to recover from it. Soil covering is the percentage of the crop that has been buried because of cultivation. We analyzed data from six field experiments, four experiments with species of small grains, barley, oat, wheat, and triticale, and two experiments with barley cultivars with different abilities to suppress weeds. The order of species' tolerance to weed harrowing was triticale>wheat>barley>oat and the differences were mainly caused by different abilities to recover from soil covering. At 25% soil covering, grain yield loss in triticale was 0.5%, in wheat 2.5%, in barley 3.7%, and in oat 6.5%. Tolerance, resistance, and recovery, however, were influenced by year, especially for oat and barley. There was no evidence of differences between barley cultivars in terms of tolerance indicating that differences among species are more important than differences among cultivars. Selectivity analysis made it possible to calculate the crop yield loss due to crop damage associated with a certain percentage of weed control. In triticale, 80% weed control was associated with 22% crop soil cover on average, which reduced grain yield 0.4% on average in the absence of weeds. Corresponding values for wheat, barley, and oat were 23, 21, and 20% crop soil cover and 2.3, 3.6, and 5.1% grain yield loss.

AB - POST weed harrowing and other cultivation methods to control weeds in early crop growth stages may result in crop damage due to low selectivity between crop and weeds. Crop tolerance to cultivation plays an important role but it has not been clearly defined and analyzed. We introduce a procedure for analyzing crop tolerance on the basis of digital image analysis. Crop tolerance is defined as the ability of the crop to avoid yield loss from cultivation in the absence of weeds, and it has two components: resistance and recovery. Resistance is the ability of the crop to resist soil covering and recovery is the ability to recover from it. Soil covering is the percentage of the crop that has been buried because of cultivation. We analyzed data from six field experiments, four experiments with species of small grains, barley, oat, wheat, and triticale, and two experiments with barley cultivars with different abilities to suppress weeds. The order of species' tolerance to weed harrowing was triticale>wheat>barley>oat and the differences were mainly caused by different abilities to recover from soil covering. At 25% soil covering, grain yield loss in triticale was 0.5%, in wheat 2.5%, in barley 3.7%, and in oat 6.5%. Tolerance, resistance, and recovery, however, were influenced by year, especially for oat and barley. There was no evidence of differences between barley cultivars in terms of tolerance indicating that differences among species are more important than differences among cultivars. Selectivity analysis made it possible to calculate the crop yield loss due to crop damage associated with a certain percentage of weed control. In triticale, 80% weed control was associated with 22% crop soil cover on average, which reduced grain yield 0.4% on average in the absence of weeds. Corresponding values for wheat, barley, and oat were 23, 21, and 20% crop soil cover and 2.3, 3.6, and 5.1% grain yield loss.

KW - BRIC

KW - Mechanical Weed Control

KW - Physical Weed Control

KW - Cultivation

KW - Tillage

U2 - 10.1614/WS-08-109.1

DO - 10.1614/WS-08-109.1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 57

SP - 338

EP - 345

JO - Weed Science

JF - Weed Science

SN - 0043-1745

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 12260365