CIED infection with either pocket or systemic infection presentation: Complete device removal and long-term antibiotic treatment; long-term outcome

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Nikolaj Ihlemann, Michael Møller-Hansen, Kirsten Salado-Rasmussen, Regitze Videbæk, Claus Moser, Kasper Iversen, Henning Bundgaard

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are increasing in numbers. The objective was to review the clinical presentation and outcome in patients affected with CIED infections with either local pocket or systemic presentation.

DESIGN: All device removals due to CIED infection during the period from 2005 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. CIED infections were categorized as systemic or pocket infections. Treatment included complete removal of the device, followed by antibiotic treatment of six weeks.

RESULTS: Seventy-one device removals due to infection (32 systemic and 39 pocket infections) were recorded during the study period. Median follow-up time was 26 (IQR 9-41) months, 30 day and 12 month mortality were 4% and 14%, respectively. There was no long-term difference in mortality between patients with pocket vs. systemic infection (p = 0.48). During follow-up no relapses and two cases of new infections were noted (2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS: CIED infection with systemic or pocket infection was difficult to distinguish in clinical presentation and outcome. Complete device removal and antibiotic treatment of long duration was safe and without relapses.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Volume50
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)52-7
Number of pages6
ISSN1401-7431
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

ID: 164451694