Predictors of lower-extremity amputation in patients with an infected diabetic foot ulcer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Kirsty Pickwell, Volkert Siersma, Marleen Kars, Jan Apelqvist, Karel Bakker, Michael Edmonds, Per Holstein, Alexandra Jirkovska, Edward Jude, Didac Mauricio, Alberto Piaggesi, Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall, Heinrich Reike, Maximillian Spraul, Luigi Uccioli, Vilma Urbancic, Kristien van Acker, Jeff van Baal, Nicolaas Schaper

OBJECTIVE Infection commonly complicates diabetic foot ulcers and is associated with a poor outcome. In a cohort of individuals with an infected diabetic foot ulcer, we aimed to determine independent predictors of lower-extremity amputation and the predictive value for amputation of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) classification system and to develop a risk score for predicting amputation.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We prospectively studied 575 patients with an infected diabetic foot ulcer presenting to 1 of 14 diabetic foot clinics in 10 European countries.

RESULTS Among these patients, 159 (28%) underwent an amputation. Independent risk factors for amputation were as follows: periwound edema, foul smell, (non)purulent exudate, deep ulcer, positive probe-to-bone test, pretibial edema, fever, and elevated C-reactive protein. Increasing IWGDF severity of infection also independently predicted amputation. We developed a risk score for any amputation and for amputations excluding the lesser toes (including the variables sex, pain on palpation, periwound edema, ulcer size, ulcer depth, and peripheral arterial disease) that predicted amputation better than the IWGDF system (area under the ROC curves 0.80, 0.78, and 0.67, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS For individuals with an infected diabetic foot ulcer, we identified independent predictors of amputation, validated the prognostic value of the IWGDF classification system, and developed a new risk score for amputation that can be readily used in daily clinical practice. Our risk score may have better prognostic accuracy than the IWGDF system, the only currently available system, but our findings need to be validated in other cohorts.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume38
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)852-857
Number of pages6
ISSN0149-5992
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

ID: 141093596