Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine? / Pernille, Hoelmkjær; Lars, Bjerrum; Marjukka, Mäkelä; Volkert, Siersma; Anne, Holm.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2019, p. 113-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pernille, H, Lars, B, Marjukka, M, Volkert, S & Anne, H 2019, 'Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine?', Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708

APA

Pernille, H., Lars, B., Marjukka, M., Volkert, S., & Anne, H. (2019). Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine? Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 37(1), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708

Vancouver

Pernille H, Lars B, Marjukka M, Volkert S, Anne H. Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine? Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2019;37(1):113-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708

Author

Pernille, Hoelmkjær ; Lars, Bjerrum ; Marjukka, Mäkelä ; Volkert, Siersma ; Anne, Holm. / Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine?. In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 113-119.

Bibtex

@article{ec3222ef46014320af701f95c9a47a23,
title = "Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine?",
abstract = "Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice. Design: Prospective diagnostic study using paired samples. Setting/Intervention: Three general practices in Copenhagen. Each woman delivered FVU and MSU samples from the same void. As a reference standard, 8 ml of MSU was sent for culture at the Microbiology Department. Patients: 117 women with one or more symptoms of UTI. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and agreement with the reference standard of FVU and MSU with different time delays (zero vs. one vs. four hours) as compared to reference standard (MSU at time zero in boric acid tubes). Results: All three POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more in agreement with the reference than when performed on FVU when analysis was done immediately. The error rate was 16{\%} for MSU vs. 23{\%} for FVU with POC culture, 27{\%} vs. 40{\%} with microscopy and 25{\%} vs. 33{\%} with dipstick testing. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease agreement with the reference. Conclusion/Implication: MSU samples should be used in general practice for optimal accuracy of POC tests. Analysis can be delayed up to four hours.Key points Point-of-care tests (dipstick testing, microscopy and culture) for diagnosing urinary tract infection performed on mid-stream urine samples are significantly more accurate than when performed on first-void urine samples. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease the accuracy of any of the point-of-care tests. Point-of-care culture was more accurate than dipstick and microscopy both when performed on mid-stream urine and first-void urine The main contaminant in first-void urine samples was Enterococci spp., which contributed to the majority of false positives.",
keywords = "“Specimen handling” [Mesh] “Urine specimen collection” [Mesh] “Primary health care” [Mesh] “General practice” [Mesh], “Urinary tract infections” [Mesh] “Urine” [Mesh]",
author = "Hoelmkj{\ae}r Pernille and Bjerrum Lars and M{\"a}kel{\"a} Marjukka and Siersma Volkert and Holm Anne",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "113--119",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care",
issn = "0281-3432",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sampling of urine for diagnosing urinary tract infection in general practice–First-void or mid-stream urine?

AU - Pernille, Hoelmkjær

AU - Lars, Bjerrum

AU - Marjukka, Mäkelä

AU - Volkert, Siersma

AU - Anne, Holm

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice. Design: Prospective diagnostic study using paired samples. Setting/Intervention: Three general practices in Copenhagen. Each woman delivered FVU and MSU samples from the same void. As a reference standard, 8 ml of MSU was sent for culture at the Microbiology Department. Patients: 117 women with one or more symptoms of UTI. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and agreement with the reference standard of FVU and MSU with different time delays (zero vs. one vs. four hours) as compared to reference standard (MSU at time zero in boric acid tubes). Results: All three POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more in agreement with the reference than when performed on FVU when analysis was done immediately. The error rate was 16% for MSU vs. 23% for FVU with POC culture, 27% vs. 40% with microscopy and 25% vs. 33% with dipstick testing. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease agreement with the reference. Conclusion/Implication: MSU samples should be used in general practice for optimal accuracy of POC tests. Analysis can be delayed up to four hours.Key points Point-of-care tests (dipstick testing, microscopy and culture) for diagnosing urinary tract infection performed on mid-stream urine samples are significantly more accurate than when performed on first-void urine samples. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease the accuracy of any of the point-of-care tests. Point-of-care culture was more accurate than dipstick and microscopy both when performed on mid-stream urine and first-void urine The main contaminant in first-void urine samples was Enterococci spp., which contributed to the majority of false positives.

AB - Objective: To study 1) whether the accuracy of point-of-care (POC) urine tests (dipstick, phase-contrast microscopy and culture) differs when performed on first-void urine (FVU) compared to mid-stream urine (MSU), and 2) if a delay of analysis up to four hours affects the accuracy of POC tests when performed on urine from symptomatic of urinary tract infection (UTI), non-pregnant women in general practice. Design: Prospective diagnostic study using paired samples. Setting/Intervention: Three general practices in Copenhagen. Each woman delivered FVU and MSU samples from the same void. As a reference standard, 8 ml of MSU was sent for culture at the Microbiology Department. Patients: 117 women with one or more symptoms of UTI. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and agreement with the reference standard of FVU and MSU with different time delays (zero vs. one vs. four hours) as compared to reference standard (MSU at time zero in boric acid tubes). Results: All three POC tests performed on MSU were significantly more in agreement with the reference than when performed on FVU when analysis was done immediately. The error rate was 16% for MSU vs. 23% for FVU with POC culture, 27% vs. 40% with microscopy and 25% vs. 33% with dipstick testing. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease agreement with the reference. Conclusion/Implication: MSU samples should be used in general practice for optimal accuracy of POC tests. Analysis can be delayed up to four hours.Key points Point-of-care tests (dipstick testing, microscopy and culture) for diagnosing urinary tract infection performed on mid-stream urine samples are significantly more accurate than when performed on first-void urine samples. Delay of analysis up to four hours did not decrease the accuracy of any of the point-of-care tests. Point-of-care culture was more accurate than dipstick and microscopy both when performed on mid-stream urine and first-void urine The main contaminant in first-void urine samples was Enterococci spp., which contributed to the majority of false positives.

KW - “Specimen handling” [Mesh] “Urine specimen collection” [Mesh] “Primary health care” [Mesh] “General practice” [Mesh]

KW - “Urinary tract infections” [Mesh] “Urine” [Mesh]

U2 - 10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708

DO - 10.1080/02813432.2019.1568708

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30689471

AN - SCOPUS:85060785664

VL - 37

SP - 113

EP - 119

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

SN - 0281-3432

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 213716079