Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Telesonography in emergency medicine : A systematic review. / Marsh-Feiley, Genevieve; Eadie, Leila; Wilson, Philip.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 5, e0194840, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Marsh-Feiley, G, Eadie, L & Wilson, P 2018, 'Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review', PLoS ONE, vol. 13, no. 5, e0194840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194840

APA

Marsh-Feiley, G., Eadie, L., & Wilson, P. (2018). Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(5), [e0194840]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194840

Vancouver

Marsh-Feiley G, Eadie L, Wilson P. Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5). e0194840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194840

Author

Marsh-Feiley, Genevieve ; Eadie, Leila ; Wilson, Philip. / Telesonography in emergency medicine : A systematic review. In: PLoS ONE. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{5bf598b34c1d496ba7cd4f955daae85a,
title = "Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review",
abstract = "Ultrasound is an efficacious, versatile and affordable imaging technique in emergencies, but has limited utility without expert interpretation. Telesonography, in which experts may remotely support the use of ultrasound through a telecommunications link, may broaden access to ultrasound and improve patient outcomes, particularly in remote settings. This review assesses the literature regarding telesonography in emergency medicine, focussing on evidence of feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. A systematic search was performed for articles published from 1946 to February 2017 using the Cochrane, Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Further searches utilising Scopus, Google Scholar, and citation lists were conducted. 4388 titles were identified and screened against inclusion criteria which resulted in the inclusion of 28 papers. These included feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and clinical pilot studies. Study design, methodology and quality were heterogeneous. There was good evidence of feasibility from multiple studies. Where sufficient bandwidth and high quality components were used, diagnostic accuracy was slightly reduced by image transmission. There was evidence of clinical utility in remote hospitals and low-resource settings, although reliability was infrequently reported. Further exploratory research is required to determine minimum requirements for image quality, bandwidth, frame rate and to assess diagnostic accuracy. Clinical trials in remote settings are justifiable. Telecommunication options will depend on local requirements; no one system conveys universal advantages. The methodological quality of research in this field must improve: studies should be designed to minimise bias, and must include details of their methods to allow replication. Analysis of cost effectiveness and sustainability should be provided.",
keywords = "Emergency Medicine/methods, Humans, Telemedicine/methods, Ultrasonography/methods",
author = "Genevieve Marsh-Feiley and Leila Eadie and Philip Wilson",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0194840",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "P L o S One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telesonography in emergency medicine

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Marsh-Feiley, Genevieve

AU - Eadie, Leila

AU - Wilson, Philip

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Ultrasound is an efficacious, versatile and affordable imaging technique in emergencies, but has limited utility without expert interpretation. Telesonography, in which experts may remotely support the use of ultrasound through a telecommunications link, may broaden access to ultrasound and improve patient outcomes, particularly in remote settings. This review assesses the literature regarding telesonography in emergency medicine, focussing on evidence of feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. A systematic search was performed for articles published from 1946 to February 2017 using the Cochrane, Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Further searches utilising Scopus, Google Scholar, and citation lists were conducted. 4388 titles were identified and screened against inclusion criteria which resulted in the inclusion of 28 papers. These included feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and clinical pilot studies. Study design, methodology and quality were heterogeneous. There was good evidence of feasibility from multiple studies. Where sufficient bandwidth and high quality components were used, diagnostic accuracy was slightly reduced by image transmission. There was evidence of clinical utility in remote hospitals and low-resource settings, although reliability was infrequently reported. Further exploratory research is required to determine minimum requirements for image quality, bandwidth, frame rate and to assess diagnostic accuracy. Clinical trials in remote settings are justifiable. Telecommunication options will depend on local requirements; no one system conveys universal advantages. The methodological quality of research in this field must improve: studies should be designed to minimise bias, and must include details of their methods to allow replication. Analysis of cost effectiveness and sustainability should be provided.

AB - Ultrasound is an efficacious, versatile and affordable imaging technique in emergencies, but has limited utility without expert interpretation. Telesonography, in which experts may remotely support the use of ultrasound through a telecommunications link, may broaden access to ultrasound and improve patient outcomes, particularly in remote settings. This review assesses the literature regarding telesonography in emergency medicine, focussing on evidence of feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. A systematic search was performed for articles published from 1946 to February 2017 using the Cochrane, Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Further searches utilising Scopus, Google Scholar, and citation lists were conducted. 4388 titles were identified and screened against inclusion criteria which resulted in the inclusion of 28 papers. These included feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and clinical pilot studies. Study design, methodology and quality were heterogeneous. There was good evidence of feasibility from multiple studies. Where sufficient bandwidth and high quality components were used, diagnostic accuracy was slightly reduced by image transmission. There was evidence of clinical utility in remote hospitals and low-resource settings, although reliability was infrequently reported. Further exploratory research is required to determine minimum requirements for image quality, bandwidth, frame rate and to assess diagnostic accuracy. Clinical trials in remote settings are justifiable. Telecommunication options will depend on local requirements; no one system conveys universal advantages. The methodological quality of research in this field must improve: studies should be designed to minimise bias, and must include details of their methods to allow replication. Analysis of cost effectiveness and sustainability should be provided.

KW - Emergency Medicine/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Telemedicine/methods

KW - Ultrasonography/methods

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0194840

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0194840

M3 - Review

VL - 13

JO - P L o S One

JF - P L o S One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - e0194840

ER -

ID: 217944377