The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine: An Introduction to Supplement 7

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine : An Introduction to Supplement 7. / Taussig, Karen-Sue; Hoeyer, Klaus ; Helmreich, Stefan .

In: Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. S7, 2013, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Taussig, K-S, Hoeyer, K & Helmreich, S 2013, 'The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine: An Introduction to Supplement 7', Current Anthropology, vol. 54, no. S7, pp. 3-14.

APA

Taussig, K-S., Hoeyer, K., & Helmreich, S. (2013). The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine: An Introduction to Supplement 7. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), 3-14.

Vancouver

Taussig K-S, Hoeyer K, Helmreich S. The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine: An Introduction to Supplement 7. Current Anthropology. 2013;54(S7):3-14.

Author

Taussig, Karen-Sue ; Hoeyer, Klaus ; Helmreich, Stefan . / The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine : An Introduction to Supplement 7. In: Current Anthropology. 2013 ; Vol. 54, No. S7. pp. 3-14.

Bibtex

@article{975d17a1278543e4840b2c7b52349ac4,
title = "The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine: An Introduction to Supplement 7",
abstract = "At the beginning of the twenty-first century, potentiality serves as a central concept in the life sciences and in medical practices. This special issue of Current Anthropology explores how genes, cells, bodies, and populations as well as technologies, disciplines, and research areas become imbued with potential. We suggest that anthropologists of the life sciences and biomedicine should work reflexively with the concept of potentiality and the politics of its naming and framing. We lay out a set of propositions and emphasize the moral aspects of claims about potentiality as well as the productivity of the ambiguity involved when dealing with that which does not (yet and may never) exist. We suggest that potentiality is both an analytic—one that has appeared explicitly and tacitly in the history of anthropology—as well as an object of study in need of further attention. To understand contemporary meanings and practices associated with potentiality, we must integrate an awareness of our own social scientific assumptions about potentiality with critical scrutiny of how the word and concept operate in the lives of the people we study.",
author = "Karen-Sue Taussig and Klaus Hoeyer and Stefan Helmreich",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Current Anthropology",
issn = "0011-3204",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "S7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Anthropology of Potentiality in Biomedicine

T2 - An Introduction to Supplement 7

AU - Taussig, Karen-Sue

AU - Hoeyer, Klaus

AU - Helmreich, Stefan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - At the beginning of the twenty-first century, potentiality serves as a central concept in the life sciences and in medical practices. This special issue of Current Anthropology explores how genes, cells, bodies, and populations as well as technologies, disciplines, and research areas become imbued with potential. We suggest that anthropologists of the life sciences and biomedicine should work reflexively with the concept of potentiality and the politics of its naming and framing. We lay out a set of propositions and emphasize the moral aspects of claims about potentiality as well as the productivity of the ambiguity involved when dealing with that which does not (yet and may never) exist. We suggest that potentiality is both an analytic—one that has appeared explicitly and tacitly in the history of anthropology—as well as an object of study in need of further attention. To understand contemporary meanings and practices associated with potentiality, we must integrate an awareness of our own social scientific assumptions about potentiality with critical scrutiny of how the word and concept operate in the lives of the people we study.

AB - At the beginning of the twenty-first century, potentiality serves as a central concept in the life sciences and in medical practices. This special issue of Current Anthropology explores how genes, cells, bodies, and populations as well as technologies, disciplines, and research areas become imbued with potential. We suggest that anthropologists of the life sciences and biomedicine should work reflexively with the concept of potentiality and the politics of its naming and framing. We lay out a set of propositions and emphasize the moral aspects of claims about potentiality as well as the productivity of the ambiguity involved when dealing with that which does not (yet and may never) exist. We suggest that potentiality is both an analytic—one that has appeared explicitly and tacitly in the history of anthropology—as well as an object of study in need of further attention. To understand contemporary meanings and practices associated with potentiality, we must integrate an awareness of our own social scientific assumptions about potentiality with critical scrutiny of how the word and concept operate in the lives of the people we study.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 54

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Current Anthropology

JF - Current Anthropology

SN - 0011-3204

IS - S7

ER -

ID: 51128582