Use of diagnostic coronary angiography in women and men presenting with acute myocardial infarction: a matched cohort study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
- Use of diagnostic coronary angiography in women and men presenting with acute myocardial infarction: a matched cohort study
Final published version, 815 KB, PDF document
Louise Hougesen Bjerking, Kim Wadt Hansen, Mette Madsen, Jan Skov Jensen, Jan Kyst Madsen, Rikke Sørensen, Søren Galatius
Background: Based on evident sex-related differences in the invasive management of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), we sought to identify predictors of diagnostic coronary angiography (DCA) and to investigate reasons for opting out an invasive strategy in women and men.
Methods: The study was designed as a matched cohort study. We randomly selected 250 female cases from a source population of 4000 patients hospitalized with a first AMI in a geographically confined region of Denmark from January 2010 to November 2011. Each case was matched to a male control on age and availability of cardiac invasive facilities at the index hospital. We systematically reviewed medical records for risk factors, comorbid conditions, clinical presentation, and receipt of DCA. Clinical justifications, as stated by the treating physician, were noted for the subset of patients who did not receive a DCA.Results: Overall, 187 women and 198 men received DCA within 60 days (75 % vs. 79 %, hazard ratio: 0.82 [0.67-1.00], p = 0.047).In the subset of patients who did not receive a DCA (n = 114), clinical justifications for opting out an invasive strategy was not documented for 21 patients (18.4 %). Type 2 myocardial infarction was noted in 11 patients (women versus men; 14.5 % vs. 3.8 %, p = 0.06) and identified as a potential confounder of the sex-DCA relationship. Conclusion: In this matched cohort of patients with a first AMI, women and men had different clinical presentations despite similar age. However, no differences in the distribution of relative contraindications for DCA were found between the sexes. Type 2 MI posed a potentiel confounder for the sex-related differences in the use of DCA. Importantly,clinical justification for opting out an invasive strategy was not documented in almost one fifth of patients not receiving a DCA.
|Journal||BMC Cardiovascular Disorders|
|Number of pages||11|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jun 2016|
- Acute myocardial infarction, Coronary angiography, Cardiac catheterization, Gender
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk