Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development. / Ivanova, Olena; Dræbel, Tania; Tellier, Siri.

In: International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol. 4, No. 10, 5, 10.2015, p. 663-671.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Ivanova, O, Dræbel, T & Tellier, S 2015, 'Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development', International Journal of Health Policy and Management, vol. 4, no. 10, 5, pp. 663-671. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148

APA

Ivanova, O., Dræbel, T., & Tellier, S. (2015). Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 4(10), 663-671. [5]. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148

Vancouver

Ivanova O, Dræbel T, Tellier S. Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2015 Oct;4(10):663-671. 5. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148

Author

Ivanova, Olena ; Dræbel, Tania ; Tellier, Siri. / Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All? Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development. In: International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2015 ; Vol. 4, No. 10. pp. 663-671.

Bibtex

@article{dded57a952f74da8abe0c088285656ad,
title = "Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All?: Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Health policies are important instruments for improving population health. However, experience suggests that policies designed for the whole population do not always benefit the most vulnerable. Participation of vulnerable groups in the policy-making process provides an opportunity for them to influence decisions related to their health, and also to exercise their rights. This paper presents the findings from a study that explored how vulnerable groups and principles of human rights are incorporated into national sexual and reproductive health (SRH) policies of 4 selected countries (Spain, Scotland, Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine). It also aimed at discussing the involvement of vulnerable groups in SRH policy development from the perspective of policy-makers.METHODS: Literature review, health policy analysis and 5 semi-structured interviews with policy-makers were carried out in this study. Content analysis of SRH policies was performed using the EquiFrame analytical framework.RESULTS: The study revealed that vulnerable groups and core principles of human rights are differently addressed in SRH policies within 4 studied countries. The opinions of policy-makers on the importance of mentioning vulnerable groups in policy documents and the way they ought to be mentioned varied, but they agreed that a clear definition of vulnerability, practical examples, and evidences on health status of these groups have to be included. In addition, different approaches to vulnerable group's involvement in policy development were identified during the interviews and the range of obstacles to this process was discussed by respondents.CONCLUSION: Incorporation of vulnerable groups in the SRH policies and their involvement in policy development were found to be important in addressing SRH of these groups and providing an opportunity for them to advocate for equal access to healthcare and exercise their rights. Future research on this topic should include representatives of vulnerable communities which could help to build a dialogue and present the problem from multiple perspectives.",
author = "Olena Ivanova and Tania Dr{\ae}bel and Siri Tellier",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
doi = "10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "663--671",
journal = "International Journal of Health Policy and Management",
issn = "2322-5939",
publisher = "Kerman University of Medical Sciences",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are Sexual and Reproductive Health Policies Designed for All?

T2 - Vulnerable Groups in Policy Documents of Four European Countries and Their Involvement in Policy Development

AU - Ivanova, Olena

AU - Dræbel, Tania

AU - Tellier, Siri

N1 - © 2015 by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Health policies are important instruments for improving population health. However, experience suggests that policies designed for the whole population do not always benefit the most vulnerable. Participation of vulnerable groups in the policy-making process provides an opportunity for them to influence decisions related to their health, and also to exercise their rights. This paper presents the findings from a study that explored how vulnerable groups and principles of human rights are incorporated into national sexual and reproductive health (SRH) policies of 4 selected countries (Spain, Scotland, Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine). It also aimed at discussing the involvement of vulnerable groups in SRH policy development from the perspective of policy-makers.METHODS: Literature review, health policy analysis and 5 semi-structured interviews with policy-makers were carried out in this study. Content analysis of SRH policies was performed using the EquiFrame analytical framework.RESULTS: The study revealed that vulnerable groups and core principles of human rights are differently addressed in SRH policies within 4 studied countries. The opinions of policy-makers on the importance of mentioning vulnerable groups in policy documents and the way they ought to be mentioned varied, but they agreed that a clear definition of vulnerability, practical examples, and evidences on health status of these groups have to be included. In addition, different approaches to vulnerable group's involvement in policy development were identified during the interviews and the range of obstacles to this process was discussed by respondents.CONCLUSION: Incorporation of vulnerable groups in the SRH policies and their involvement in policy development were found to be important in addressing SRH of these groups and providing an opportunity for them to advocate for equal access to healthcare and exercise their rights. Future research on this topic should include representatives of vulnerable communities which could help to build a dialogue and present the problem from multiple perspectives.

AB - BACKGROUND: Health policies are important instruments for improving population health. However, experience suggests that policies designed for the whole population do not always benefit the most vulnerable. Participation of vulnerable groups in the policy-making process provides an opportunity for them to influence decisions related to their health, and also to exercise their rights. This paper presents the findings from a study that explored how vulnerable groups and principles of human rights are incorporated into national sexual and reproductive health (SRH) policies of 4 selected countries (Spain, Scotland, Republic of Moldova, and Ukraine). It also aimed at discussing the involvement of vulnerable groups in SRH policy development from the perspective of policy-makers.METHODS: Literature review, health policy analysis and 5 semi-structured interviews with policy-makers were carried out in this study. Content analysis of SRH policies was performed using the EquiFrame analytical framework.RESULTS: The study revealed that vulnerable groups and core principles of human rights are differently addressed in SRH policies within 4 studied countries. The opinions of policy-makers on the importance of mentioning vulnerable groups in policy documents and the way they ought to be mentioned varied, but they agreed that a clear definition of vulnerability, practical examples, and evidences on health status of these groups have to be included. In addition, different approaches to vulnerable group's involvement in policy development were identified during the interviews and the range of obstacles to this process was discussed by respondents.CONCLUSION: Incorporation of vulnerable groups in the SRH policies and their involvement in policy development were found to be important in addressing SRH of these groups and providing an opportunity for them to advocate for equal access to healthcare and exercise their rights. Future research on this topic should include representatives of vulnerable communities which could help to build a dialogue and present the problem from multiple perspectives.

U2 - 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148

DO - 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.148

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26673176

VL - 4

SP - 663

EP - 671

JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

SN - 2322-5939

IS - 10

M1 - 5

ER -

ID: 161081863