Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Criteria for the replacement of restorations : Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. / Wilson, Nairn; Lynch , Christopher ; Brunton, Paul Brunton; Hickel, Reinhard ; Meyer-Lueckel , Hendrik ; Gurgan , Sevil ; Pallesen, Ulla; Shearer, Ann; Tarle , Zrinka ; Cotti , Elisabettta; Vanherle , Guido ; Opdam, Niek .

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 41, No. S7, 2016, p. S48-S57.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wilson, N, Lynch , C, Brunton, PB, Hickel, R, Meyer-Lueckel , H, Gurgan , S, Pallesen, U, Shearer, A, Tarle , Z, Cotti , E, Vanherle , G & Opdam, N 2016, 'Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section', Operative Dentistry, vol. 41, no. S7, pp. S48-S57. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-058-O

APA

Wilson, N., Lynch , C., Brunton, P. B., Hickel, R., Meyer-Lueckel , H., Gurgan , S., ... Opdam, N. (2016). Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Operative Dentistry, 41(S7), S48-S57. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-058-O

Vancouver

Wilson N, Lynch C, Brunton PB, Hickel R, Meyer-Lueckel H, Gurgan S et al. Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. Operative Dentistry. 2016;41(S7):S48-S57. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-058-O

Author

Wilson, Nairn ; Lynch , Christopher ; Brunton, Paul Brunton ; Hickel, Reinhard ; Meyer-Lueckel , Hendrik ; Gurgan , Sevil ; Pallesen, Ulla ; Shearer, Ann ; Tarle , Zrinka ; Cotti , Elisabettta ; Vanherle , Guido ; Opdam, Niek . / Criteria for the replacement of restorations : Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section. In: Operative Dentistry. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. S7. pp. S48-S57.

Bibtex

@article{39549005cf22457ab523b5ed4fad9150,
title = "Criteria for the replacement of restorations: Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section",
abstract = "The replacement of a restoration is one of the most common procedures in dentistry. However, the criteria for such intervention, excluding catastrophic failure and persistent discomfort and pain, continue to be the subject of considerable debate. The decision-making process remains subjective on the part of the treating clinician, while the evidence base for refurbishment and repair rather than replacement for the management of defective and failing restorations continues to grow and strengthen. This article, prepared as an Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section consensus publication, reviews existing criteria for the replacement of restorations and encourages practitioners to shift, if not already doing so, to considering the replacement of a restoration as a last resort rather than as a prudent action to be taken if in any doubtabout clinical acceptability. Further research in the area, spanning the risk assessment of defective and failing restorations and new diagnostic tools and processes, together with work to enhance the evidence base of restorationrepair vs replacement, would be of immense value.",
keywords = "Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, restoration, replacement, repair, refurbishment, monitoring, criteria",
author = "Nairn Wilson and Christopher Lynch and Brunton, {Paul Brunton} and Reinhard Hickel and Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel and Sevil Gurgan and Ulla Pallesen and Ann Shearer and Zrinka Tarle and Elisabettta Cotti and Guido Vanherle and Niek Opdam",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.2341/15-058-O",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "S48--S57",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Operative Dentistry",
number = "S7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for the replacement of restorations

T2 - Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section

AU - Wilson, Nairn

AU - Lynch , Christopher

AU - Brunton, Paul Brunton

AU - Hickel, Reinhard

AU - Meyer-Lueckel , Hendrik

AU - Gurgan , Sevil

AU - Pallesen, Ulla

AU - Shearer, Ann

AU - Tarle , Zrinka

AU - Cotti , Elisabettta

AU - Vanherle , Guido

AU - Opdam, Niek

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The replacement of a restoration is one of the most common procedures in dentistry. However, the criteria for such intervention, excluding catastrophic failure and persistent discomfort and pain, continue to be the subject of considerable debate. The decision-making process remains subjective on the part of the treating clinician, while the evidence base for refurbishment and repair rather than replacement for the management of defective and failing restorations continues to grow and strengthen. This article, prepared as an Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section consensus publication, reviews existing criteria for the replacement of restorations and encourages practitioners to shift, if not already doing so, to considering the replacement of a restoration as a last resort rather than as a prudent action to be taken if in any doubtabout clinical acceptability. Further research in the area, spanning the risk assessment of defective and failing restorations and new diagnostic tools and processes, together with work to enhance the evidence base of restorationrepair vs replacement, would be of immense value.

AB - The replacement of a restoration is one of the most common procedures in dentistry. However, the criteria for such intervention, excluding catastrophic failure and persistent discomfort and pain, continue to be the subject of considerable debate. The decision-making process remains subjective on the part of the treating clinician, while the evidence base for refurbishment and repair rather than replacement for the management of defective and failing restorations continues to grow and strengthen. This article, prepared as an Academy of Operative Dentistry European Section consensus publication, reviews existing criteria for the replacement of restorations and encourages practitioners to shift, if not already doing so, to considering the replacement of a restoration as a last resort rather than as a prudent action to be taken if in any doubtabout clinical acceptability. Further research in the area, spanning the risk assessment of defective and failing restorations and new diagnostic tools and processes, together with work to enhance the evidence base of restorationrepair vs replacement, would be of immense value.

KW - Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

KW - restoration, replacement, repair, refurbishment, monitoring, criteria

U2 - 10.2341/15-058-O

DO - 10.2341/15-058-O

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27689930

VL - 41

SP - S48-S57

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - S7

ER -

ID: 140336146