Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia: A randomized trial in primary care

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia : A randomized trial in primary care. / Jarbol, Dorte Ejg; Bech, Mickael; Kragstrup, Jakob; Havelund, Troels; De Muckadell, Ove B.Schaffalitzky.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 22, No. 3, 07.2006, p. 362-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jarbol, DE, Bech, M, Kragstrup, J, Havelund, T & De Muckadell, OBS 2006, 'Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia: A randomized trial in primary care', International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462306051269

APA

Jarbol, D. E., Bech, M., Kragstrup, J., Havelund, T., & De Muckadell, O. B. S. (2006). Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia: A randomized trial in primary care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 22(3), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462306051269

Vancouver

Jarbol DE, Bech M, Kragstrup J, Havelund T, De Muckadell OBS. Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia: A randomized trial in primary care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2006 Jul;22(3):362-371. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462306051269

Author

Jarbol, Dorte Ejg ; Bech, Mickael ; Kragstrup, Jakob ; Havelund, Troels ; De Muckadell, Ove B.Schaffalitzky. / Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia : A randomized trial in primary care. In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2006 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 362-371.

Bibtex

@article{4907fcc78bbc425f91df1a0d61e5c538,
title = "Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia: A randomized trial in primary care",
abstract = "Objectives: An economic evaluation was performed of empirical antisecretory therapy versus test for Helicobacter pylori in the management of dyspepsia patients presenting in primary care. Methods: A randomized trial in 106 general practices in the County of Funen, Denmark, was designed to include prospective collection of clinical outcome measures and resource utilization data. Dyspepsia patients (n=722) presenting in general practice with more than 2 weeks of epigastric pain or discomfort were managed according to one of three initial management strategies: (i) empirical antisecretory therapy, (ii) testing for Helicobacter pylori, or (iii) empirical antisecretory therapy, followed by Helicobacter pylori testing if symptoms improved. Cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the strategies were determined. Results: The mean proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms during the 1-year follow-up was 0.59 in the group treated with empirical antisecretory therapy, 0.57 in the H. pylori test-and-eradicate group, and 0.53 in the combination group. After 1 year, 23 percent, 26 percent, and 22 percent, respectively, were symptom-free. Applying the proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms, the cost-effectiveness for empirical treatment, H. pylori test and the combination were 12,131 Danish kroner (DKK), 9,576 DKK, and 7,301 DKK, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness going from the combination strategy to empirical antisecretory treatment or H. pylori test alone was 54,783 DKK and 39,700 DKK per additional proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms. Conclusions: Empirical antisecretory therapy confers a small insignificant benefit but costs more than strategies based on test for H. pylori and is probably not a cost-effective strategy for the management of dyspepsia in primary care.",
keywords = "Antiulcer agents, Dyspepsia, Healthcare costs, Helicobacter pylori, Primary health care",
author = "Jarbol, {Dorte Ejg} and Mickael Bech and Jakob Kragstrup and Troels Havelund and {De Muckadell}, {Ove B.Schaffalitzky}",
year = "2006",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1017/S0266462306051269",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "362--371",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic evaluation of empirical antisecretory therapy versus Helicobacter pylori for management of dyspepsia

T2 - A randomized trial in primary care

AU - Jarbol, Dorte Ejg

AU - Bech, Mickael

AU - Kragstrup, Jakob

AU - Havelund, Troels

AU - De Muckadell, Ove B.Schaffalitzky

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Objectives: An economic evaluation was performed of empirical antisecretory therapy versus test for Helicobacter pylori in the management of dyspepsia patients presenting in primary care. Methods: A randomized trial in 106 general practices in the County of Funen, Denmark, was designed to include prospective collection of clinical outcome measures and resource utilization data. Dyspepsia patients (n=722) presenting in general practice with more than 2 weeks of epigastric pain or discomfort were managed according to one of three initial management strategies: (i) empirical antisecretory therapy, (ii) testing for Helicobacter pylori, or (iii) empirical antisecretory therapy, followed by Helicobacter pylori testing if symptoms improved. Cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the strategies were determined. Results: The mean proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms during the 1-year follow-up was 0.59 in the group treated with empirical antisecretory therapy, 0.57 in the H. pylori test-and-eradicate group, and 0.53 in the combination group. After 1 year, 23 percent, 26 percent, and 22 percent, respectively, were symptom-free. Applying the proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms, the cost-effectiveness for empirical treatment, H. pylori test and the combination were 12,131 Danish kroner (DKK), 9,576 DKK, and 7,301 DKK, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness going from the combination strategy to empirical antisecretory treatment or H. pylori test alone was 54,783 DKK and 39,700 DKK per additional proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms. Conclusions: Empirical antisecretory therapy confers a small insignificant benefit but costs more than strategies based on test for H. pylori and is probably not a cost-effective strategy for the management of dyspepsia in primary care.

AB - Objectives: An economic evaluation was performed of empirical antisecretory therapy versus test for Helicobacter pylori in the management of dyspepsia patients presenting in primary care. Methods: A randomized trial in 106 general practices in the County of Funen, Denmark, was designed to include prospective collection of clinical outcome measures and resource utilization data. Dyspepsia patients (n=722) presenting in general practice with more than 2 weeks of epigastric pain or discomfort were managed according to one of three initial management strategies: (i) empirical antisecretory therapy, (ii) testing for Helicobacter pylori, or (iii) empirical antisecretory therapy, followed by Helicobacter pylori testing if symptoms improved. Cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the strategies were determined. Results: The mean proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms during the 1-year follow-up was 0.59 in the group treated with empirical antisecretory therapy, 0.57 in the H. pylori test-and-eradicate group, and 0.53 in the combination group. After 1 year, 23 percent, 26 percent, and 22 percent, respectively, were symptom-free. Applying the proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms, the cost-effectiveness for empirical treatment, H. pylori test and the combination were 12,131 Danish kroner (DKK), 9,576 DKK, and 7,301 DKK, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness going from the combination strategy to empirical antisecretory treatment or H. pylori test alone was 54,783 DKK and 39,700 DKK per additional proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms. Conclusions: Empirical antisecretory therapy confers a small insignificant benefit but costs more than strategies based on test for H. pylori and is probably not a cost-effective strategy for the management of dyspepsia in primary care.

KW - Antiulcer agents

KW - Dyspepsia

KW - Healthcare costs

KW - Helicobacter pylori

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749119997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0266462306051269

DO - 10.1017/S0266462306051269

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16984065

AN - SCOPUS:33749119997

VL - 22

SP - 362

EP - 371

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 324141179