Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Enforcement and Public Corruption : Evidence from US States. / James E., Alt; Lassen, David Dreyer.

Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2010.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

James E., A & Lassen, DD 2010 'Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States' Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

APA

James E., A., & Lassen, D. D. (2010). Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

James E. A, Lassen DD. Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. 2010.

Author

James E., Alt ; Lassen, David Dreyer. / Enforcement and Public Corruption : Evidence from US States. Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2010.

Bibtex

@techreport{93005480b0f611df825b000ea68e967b,
title = "Enforcement and Public Corruption: Evidence from US States",
abstract = "We use high-quality panel data on corruption convictions, new panels of assistant U.S. attorneys and relative public sector wages, and careful attention to the consequences of modeling endogeneity to estimate the impact of prosecutorial resources on criminal convictions of those who undertake corrupt acts. Consistent with {"}system capacity{"} arguments, we find that greater prosecutor resources result in more convictions for corruption, other things equal. We find more limited, recent evidence for the deterrent effect of increased prosecutions. We control for and confirm in a panel context the effects of many previously identified correlates and causes of corruption. By explicitly determining the allocation of prosecutorial resources endogenously from past corruption convictions and political considerations, we show that this specification leads to larger estimates of the effect of resources on convictions. The results are robust to various ways of measuring the number of convictions as well as to various estimators.",
keywords = "Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, corruption, rent seeking, enforcement, efficiency wage, public sector wages, system capacity",
author = "{James E.}, Alt and Lassen, {David Dreyer}",
note = "JEL classification: D72, D73, H83, K42",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Enforcement and Public Corruption

T2 - Evidence from US States

AU - James E., Alt

AU - Lassen, David Dreyer

N1 - JEL classification: D72, D73, H83, K42

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - We use high-quality panel data on corruption convictions, new panels of assistant U.S. attorneys and relative public sector wages, and careful attention to the consequences of modeling endogeneity to estimate the impact of prosecutorial resources on criminal convictions of those who undertake corrupt acts. Consistent with "system capacity" arguments, we find that greater prosecutor resources result in more convictions for corruption, other things equal. We find more limited, recent evidence for the deterrent effect of increased prosecutions. We control for and confirm in a panel context the effects of many previously identified correlates and causes of corruption. By explicitly determining the allocation of prosecutorial resources endogenously from past corruption convictions and political considerations, we show that this specification leads to larger estimates of the effect of resources on convictions. The results are robust to various ways of measuring the number of convictions as well as to various estimators.

AB - We use high-quality panel data on corruption convictions, new panels of assistant U.S. attorneys and relative public sector wages, and careful attention to the consequences of modeling endogeneity to estimate the impact of prosecutorial resources on criminal convictions of those who undertake corrupt acts. Consistent with "system capacity" arguments, we find that greater prosecutor resources result in more convictions for corruption, other things equal. We find more limited, recent evidence for the deterrent effect of increased prosecutions. We control for and confirm in a panel context the effects of many previously identified correlates and causes of corruption. By explicitly determining the allocation of prosecutorial resources endogenously from past corruption convictions and political considerations, we show that this specification leads to larger estimates of the effect of resources on convictions. The results are robust to various ways of measuring the number of convictions as well as to various estimators.

KW - Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

KW - corruption

KW - rent seeking

KW - enforcement

KW - efficiency wage

KW - public sector wages

KW - system capacity

M3 - Working paper

BT - Enforcement and Public Corruption

PB - Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 21594320