In utero exposure to extra vitamin D from food fortification and the risk of subsequent development of gestational diabetes: the D-tect study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Standard
In utero exposure to extra vitamin D from food fortification and the risk of subsequent development of gestational diabetes : the D-tect study. / Keller, Amélie; Stougård, Maria; Frederiksen, Peder; Thorsteinsdottir, Fanney; Vaag, Allan; Damm, Peter; Jacobsen, Ramune; L Heitmann, Berit.
In: Nutrition Journal, Vol. 17, 100, 2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - In utero exposure to extra vitamin D from food fortification and the risk of subsequent development of gestational diabetes
T2 - the D-tect study
AU - Keller, Amélie
AU - Stougård, Maria
AU - Frederiksen, Peder
AU - Thorsteinsdottir, Fanney
AU - Vaag, Allan
AU - Damm, Peter
AU - Jacobsen, Ramune
AU - L Heitmann, Berit
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether exposure during fetal life to extra vitamin D from food fortification was associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequently developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Furthermore, we examined whether the effect of the vitamin D from fortification differed by women's season of birth.METHODS: This semi-ecological study is based on the cancellation in 1985 of the mandatory policy to fortify margarine with vitamin D in Denmark, with inclusion of entire national adjacent birth cohorts either exposed or unexposed to extra vitamin D in utero. The identification of GDM cases later in life among both exposure groups was based on the Danish national health registers. Logistic regression analyses generating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were performed.RESULTS: Women who were prenatally exposed to the extra vitamin D from fortification tended to have a lower risk of subsequently developing GDM than unexposed women (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.74,1.02, P = 0.08). When analyses were stratified by women's season of birth, exposed women born in spring had a lower risk of developing GDM compared to unexposed subjects (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.50,0.94, p = 0.02).CONCLUSION: This study suggests that prenatal exposure to extra vitamin D from mandatory fortification may lower the risk of developing gestational diabetes among spring-born women.TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is part of the D-tect project, which is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03330301 .
AB - BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether exposure during fetal life to extra vitamin D from food fortification was associated with a reduction in the risk of subsequently developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Furthermore, we examined whether the effect of the vitamin D from fortification differed by women's season of birth.METHODS: This semi-ecological study is based on the cancellation in 1985 of the mandatory policy to fortify margarine with vitamin D in Denmark, with inclusion of entire national adjacent birth cohorts either exposed or unexposed to extra vitamin D in utero. The identification of GDM cases later in life among both exposure groups was based on the Danish national health registers. Logistic regression analyses generating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were performed.RESULTS: Women who were prenatally exposed to the extra vitamin D from fortification tended to have a lower risk of subsequently developing GDM than unexposed women (OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.74,1.02, P = 0.08). When analyses were stratified by women's season of birth, exposed women born in spring had a lower risk of developing GDM compared to unexposed subjects (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.50,0.94, p = 0.02).CONCLUSION: This study suggests that prenatal exposure to extra vitamin D from mandatory fortification may lower the risk of developing gestational diabetes among spring-born women.TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is part of the D-tect project, which is registered on clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03330301 .
U2 - 10.1186/s12937-018-0403-5
DO - 10.1186/s12937-018-0403-5
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30388966
VL - 17
JO - Nutrition Journal
JF - Nutrition Journal
SN - 1475-2891
M1 - 100
ER -
ID: 210836416