It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice. / Frederiksen, Heidi Bøgelund; Kragstrup, Jakob; Dehlholm-Lambertsen, Gitte.

In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 10, 47, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Frederiksen, HB, Kragstrup, J & Dehlholm-Lambertsen, G 2009, 'It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice', BMC Family Practice, vol. 10, 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-47

APA

Frederiksen, H. B., Kragstrup, J., & Dehlholm-Lambertsen, G. (2009). It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice. BMC Family Practice, 10, [47]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-47

Vancouver

Frederiksen HB, Kragstrup J, Dehlholm-Lambertsen G. It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice. BMC Family Practice. 2009;10. 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-47

Author

Frederiksen, Heidi Bøgelund ; Kragstrup, Jakob ; Dehlholm-Lambertsen, Gitte. / It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice. In: BMC Family Practice. 2009 ; Vol. 10.

Bibtex

@article{b76a8159d30a4f51b6f3a806748c0831,
title = "It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice",
abstract = "Background. Continuity of care has traditionally been regarded as a core quality of general practice, but the long-term doctor-patient relationship has been put under pressure. In many places practices are expanding, with larger teams and more registered patients, thereby threatening the possibility of patients staying with their own general practitioner (GP). GPs often take it for granted that interpersonal continuity is valuable. However, little is known about how patient satisfaction is related to interpersonal continuity. The purpose of this study is to explore the creation of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the interpersonal relation with the GP, and in a comprehensive way to investigate how this is related to continuity of care. Methods. Qualitative study based on 22 interviews with patients from two practices in Denmark. A total of 12 patients saw a regular doctor and 10 saw an unfamiliar doctor. The patients were selected after an observed consultation and sampled purposefully according to reason for encounter, age and sex. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to study how patients perceive meeting either a regular or an unfamiliar GP. The analysis explored the patients' perception of their interpersonal relationship with their GP, and interpreted the accounts by using social psychological theories. Results. A long-term continuous relationship with the GP could be satisfactory, but it could also be the reverse. The same pattern was shown in case of an unfamiliar GP. Therefore, patient satisfaction and interpersonal continuity were not causally related. On the contrary, there was a general pattern of how the satisfactory and trustful doctor-patient relationship from the patients' point of view could be created, maintained or destroyed. A pattern where the process of recognition, by respecting and remembering, on the one hand created and maintained satisfaction while humiliation on the other hand destroyed satisfaction in the relationship. Conclusion. It was not valuable to have a continuous relationship unless the GP recognized the patient. The social psychological concept of recognition had two different meanings and the GP had to do both, respect and remember the patient, in order to create and sustain the trustful relationship. The added value of interpersonal continuity had to be combined with recognition.",
author = "Frederiksen, {Heidi B{\o}gelund} and Jakob Kragstrup and Gitte Dehlholm-Lambertsen",
note = "Funding Information: The study was funded by the Danish Research Foundations for General Practice. We are very grateful to the patients who agreed to be interviewed and acknowledge the GPs and their practice staff who participated.",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-10-47",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMC Primary Care",
issn = "2731-4553",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice

AU - Frederiksen, Heidi Bøgelund

AU - Kragstrup, Jakob

AU - Dehlholm-Lambertsen, Gitte

N1 - Funding Information: The study was funded by the Danish Research Foundations for General Practice. We are very grateful to the patients who agreed to be interviewed and acknowledge the GPs and their practice staff who participated.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background. Continuity of care has traditionally been regarded as a core quality of general practice, but the long-term doctor-patient relationship has been put under pressure. In many places practices are expanding, with larger teams and more registered patients, thereby threatening the possibility of patients staying with their own general practitioner (GP). GPs often take it for granted that interpersonal continuity is valuable. However, little is known about how patient satisfaction is related to interpersonal continuity. The purpose of this study is to explore the creation of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the interpersonal relation with the GP, and in a comprehensive way to investigate how this is related to continuity of care. Methods. Qualitative study based on 22 interviews with patients from two practices in Denmark. A total of 12 patients saw a regular doctor and 10 saw an unfamiliar doctor. The patients were selected after an observed consultation and sampled purposefully according to reason for encounter, age and sex. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to study how patients perceive meeting either a regular or an unfamiliar GP. The analysis explored the patients' perception of their interpersonal relationship with their GP, and interpreted the accounts by using social psychological theories. Results. A long-term continuous relationship with the GP could be satisfactory, but it could also be the reverse. The same pattern was shown in case of an unfamiliar GP. Therefore, patient satisfaction and interpersonal continuity were not causally related. On the contrary, there was a general pattern of how the satisfactory and trustful doctor-patient relationship from the patients' point of view could be created, maintained or destroyed. A pattern where the process of recognition, by respecting and remembering, on the one hand created and maintained satisfaction while humiliation on the other hand destroyed satisfaction in the relationship. Conclusion. It was not valuable to have a continuous relationship unless the GP recognized the patient. The social psychological concept of recognition had two different meanings and the GP had to do both, respect and remember the patient, in order to create and sustain the trustful relationship. The added value of interpersonal continuity had to be combined with recognition.

AB - Background. Continuity of care has traditionally been regarded as a core quality of general practice, but the long-term doctor-patient relationship has been put under pressure. In many places practices are expanding, with larger teams and more registered patients, thereby threatening the possibility of patients staying with their own general practitioner (GP). GPs often take it for granted that interpersonal continuity is valuable. However, little is known about how patient satisfaction is related to interpersonal continuity. The purpose of this study is to explore the creation of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the interpersonal relation with the GP, and in a comprehensive way to investigate how this is related to continuity of care. Methods. Qualitative study based on 22 interviews with patients from two practices in Denmark. A total of 12 patients saw a regular doctor and 10 saw an unfamiliar doctor. The patients were selected after an observed consultation and sampled purposefully according to reason for encounter, age and sex. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to study how patients perceive meeting either a regular or an unfamiliar GP. The analysis explored the patients' perception of their interpersonal relationship with their GP, and interpreted the accounts by using social psychological theories. Results. A long-term continuous relationship with the GP could be satisfactory, but it could also be the reverse. The same pattern was shown in case of an unfamiliar GP. Therefore, patient satisfaction and interpersonal continuity were not causally related. On the contrary, there was a general pattern of how the satisfactory and trustful doctor-patient relationship from the patients' point of view could be created, maintained or destroyed. A pattern where the process of recognition, by respecting and remembering, on the one hand created and maintained satisfaction while humiliation on the other hand destroyed satisfaction in the relationship. Conclusion. It was not valuable to have a continuous relationship unless the GP recognized the patient. The social psychological concept of recognition had two different meanings and the GP had to do both, respect and remember the patient, in order to create and sustain the trustful relationship. The added value of interpersonal continuity had to be combined with recognition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68249162575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-10-47

DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-10-47

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19558666

AN - SCOPUS:68249162575

VL - 10

JO - BMC Primary Care

JF - BMC Primary Care

SN - 2731-4553

M1 - 47

ER -

ID: 324139845