Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study. / Jensen, Hans Henrik; Mortensen, Erik Lykke; Lotz, Martin.

In: Psychology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 27.02.2017, p. 436-448.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Jensen, HH, Mortensen, EL & Lotz, M 2017, 'Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study', Psychology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 436-448. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83027

APA

Jensen, H. H., Mortensen, E. L., & Lotz, M. (2017). Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study. Psychology, 8(3), 436-448. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83027

Vancouver

Jensen HH, Mortensen EL, Lotz M. Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study. Psychology. 2017 Feb 27;8(3):436-448. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83027

Author

Jensen, Hans Henrik ; Mortensen, Erik Lykke ; Lotz, Martin. / Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study. In: Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 436-448.

Bibtex

@article{7859276fb6474999ba86356f526143dc,
title = "Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study",
abstract = "We examine project drop-out in 39 sessions of psychodynamic group therapy. A total of 327 patients were included in the project, but 25.4% (83) did not evaluate outcome. According to therapists{\textquoteright} evaluation only 25.3% of the project drop-outs “improved” in “symptoms and problems” as compared with 79.1% of the project responders. According to Jacobson & Truax{\textquoteright}s classification of Reliable Change, 52.9% of the project responders had a reliable improvement in the SCL-90 R Global Severity Index (GSI). Based on the relationship between therapist evaluations and GSI we estimated that only 43.7% of the whole samples might have had a reliable improvement in GSI. The SPSS standard statistical imputations procedure estimated that 48.6% of the patients reliably improved in GSI, and 50.2% when therapist evaluations were not included. It is concluded that therapist evaluations are essential in order to avoid bias in reported outcome solely based on project responders in the present naturalistic study, where outcome data probably are missing not at random.",
author = "Jensen, {Hans Henrik} and Mortensen, {Erik Lykke} and Martin Lotz",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "27",
doi = "10.4236/psych.2017.83027",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "436--448",
journal = "Psychology (Irvine)",
issn = "2152-7180",
publisher = "Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing outcome data in a naturalistic psychodynamic group therapy study

AU - Jensen, Hans Henrik

AU - Mortensen, Erik Lykke

AU - Lotz, Martin

PY - 2017/2/27

Y1 - 2017/2/27

N2 - We examine project drop-out in 39 sessions of psychodynamic group therapy. A total of 327 patients were included in the project, but 25.4% (83) did not evaluate outcome. According to therapists’ evaluation only 25.3% of the project drop-outs “improved” in “symptoms and problems” as compared with 79.1% of the project responders. According to Jacobson & Truax’s classification of Reliable Change, 52.9% of the project responders had a reliable improvement in the SCL-90 R Global Severity Index (GSI). Based on the relationship between therapist evaluations and GSI we estimated that only 43.7% of the whole samples might have had a reliable improvement in GSI. The SPSS standard statistical imputations procedure estimated that 48.6% of the patients reliably improved in GSI, and 50.2% when therapist evaluations were not included. It is concluded that therapist evaluations are essential in order to avoid bias in reported outcome solely based on project responders in the present naturalistic study, where outcome data probably are missing not at random.

AB - We examine project drop-out in 39 sessions of psychodynamic group therapy. A total of 327 patients were included in the project, but 25.4% (83) did not evaluate outcome. According to therapists’ evaluation only 25.3% of the project drop-outs “improved” in “symptoms and problems” as compared with 79.1% of the project responders. According to Jacobson & Truax’s classification of Reliable Change, 52.9% of the project responders had a reliable improvement in the SCL-90 R Global Severity Index (GSI). Based on the relationship between therapist evaluations and GSI we estimated that only 43.7% of the whole samples might have had a reliable improvement in GSI. The SPSS standard statistical imputations procedure estimated that 48.6% of the patients reliably improved in GSI, and 50.2% when therapist evaluations were not included. It is concluded that therapist evaluations are essential in order to avoid bias in reported outcome solely based on project responders in the present naturalistic study, where outcome data probably are missing not at random.

U2 - 10.4236/psych.2017.83027

DO - 10.4236/psych.2017.83027

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 436

EP - 448

JO - Psychology (Irvine)

JF - Psychology (Irvine)

SN - 2152-7180

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 192561101