Multimodal assessment of precentral anodal TDCS: Individual rise in supplementary motor activity scales with increase in corticospinal excitability

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Documents

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) targeting the primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) may induce lasting shifts in corticospinal excitability, but after-effects show substantial inter-individual variability. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can probe after-effects of TDCS on regional neural activity on a whole-brain level.

Objective: Using a double-blinded cross-over design, we investigated whether the individual change in corticospinal excitability after TDCS of M1-HAND is associated with changes in task-related regional activity in cortical motor areas.

Methods: Seventeen healthy volunteers (10 women) received 20 min of real (0.75 mA) or sham TDCS on separate days in randomized order. Real and sham TDCS used the classic bipolar set-up with the anode placed over right M1-HAND. Before and after each TDCS session, we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the relaxed left first dorsal interosseus muscle after single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation(TMS) of left M1-HAND and performed whole-brain fMRI at 3 Tesla while participants completed a visuomotor tracking task with their left hand. We also assessed the difference in MEP latency when applying anterior-posterior and latero-medial TMS pulses to the precentral hand knob (AP-LM MEP latency).

Results: Real TDCS had no consistent aftereffects on mean MEP amplitude, task-related activity or motor performance. Individual changes in MEP amplitude, measured directly after real TDCS showed a positive linear relationship with individual changes in task-related activity in the supplementary motor area and AP-LM MEP latency.

Conclusion: Functional aftereffects of classical bipolar anodal TDCS of M1-HAND on the motor system vary substantially across individuals. Physiological features upstream from the primary motor cortex may determine how anodal TDCS changes corticospinal excitability.

Original languageEnglish
Article number639274
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume15
Number of pages13
ISSN1662-5161
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021 Karabanov, Shindo, Shindo, Raffin and Siebner.

    Research areas

  • Faculty of Science - Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), Inter-individual variability, Motor evoked potentials, Primary motor cortex (M1), Supplementary motor area (SMA), Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Non-invasive brain stimulation, Transcrancial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 258892501