Neuromuscular Electric Stimulation in Addition to Exercise Therapy in Patients with Lower Extremity Paresis Due to Acute Ischemic Stroke. A proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Accepted author manuscript, 754 KB, PDF document

  • Henriette Busk
  • Søren Thorgaard Skou
  • Louise Feldborg Lyckhage
  • Nasrin Asgari
  • Wienecke, Troels
Abstract
Introduction: Exercise therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) during the initial 14 days after stroke may benefit recovery of gait. We aimed to determine whether poststroke NMES of vastus medial and tibial muscles during exercise therapy is more effective than exercise therapy alone.

Materials and methods: In this proof-of-concept randomised trial patients with first-ever acute ischemic stroke and a leg paresis (40-85 years of age) were randomised (1:1) to 10 min of daily NMES + exercise therapy or exercise therapy alone. Primary outcome was the between-group difference in change in 6 min Walk Test (6MWT) at 90 days post stroke estimated with a mixed regression model. Secondary outcomes included 10 m Walk Test, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, Guralnik Timed Standing Balance, Sit to Stand, Timed Up and Go, EQ-5D-5L, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Becks Depression Inventory.

Results: 50 stroke survivors (25 in each group) with a mean age of 67 years (range 43-83) were included. An insignificant between-group difference in change of 28.3 m (95%CI -16.0 to 72.6, p = 0.23, adjusted for baseline) in 6MWT at 90-days follow-up was found, in favour of the NMES group. All secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant between-group difference. The conclusion was that adding NMES to exercise therapy had no effect on poststroke walking distance measured by the 6 MWT or any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: In this proof-of-concept RCT, we demonstrated that NMES in addition to exercise therapy during the first 14 days after onset of ischemic stroke did not improve walking distance or any of the secondary outcomes. Future studies with a longer trial period, stratifying patients into subgroups with comparable patterns of expected spontaneous recovery - if possible within 48 h post stroke, and greater sample size, than in this study are suggestions of how rehabilitation research could go on exploring the potential for NMES as an amplifier in stroke recovery.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106050
JournalJournal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume30
Issue number10
Number of pages30
ISSN1052-3057
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 291367977