Organisational factors and under-reporting of occupational injuries in Sweden: a population-based study using capture-recapture methodology

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 268 KB, PDF document

  • Cecilia Orellana
  • Kreshpaj, Bertina
  • Bo Burstrom
  • Letitia Davis
  • Paolo Frumento
  • Tomas Hemmingsson
  • Gun Johansson
  • Katarina Kjellberg
  • David H Wegman
  • Theo Bodin

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the magnitude of under-reporting of non-fatal occupational injuries (OIs) by different organisational factors in Sweden for the year 2013.

METHODS: Capture-recapture methods were applied using two data sources: (1) the national OI register and (2) records from a labour market insurance company. To assure comparability of data sources, the analysis was restricted to the public sector and private companies with at least 50 employees. OIs were matched using personal identification number and reported injury dates (±7 days). Organisational factors were obtained from the national labour market register and injury severity (no healthcare/only outpatient/hospitalised) from the National Patient Register. Total number of OIs and ascertainment by data sources were estimated assuming data source independence.

RESULTS: There were an estimated 98 493 OIs in 2013. Completeness of reporting OIs to the national register and to the insurance company was estimated at 73% and 43%, respectively. No report to either source was estimated at 15 000 OIs (~15%). Under-reporting to the national register differed by selected organisational factors, being higher among organisations in the public sector, those with more females, with a younger workforce and with a higher proportion of immigrants. Overall under-reporting was more common in agriculture (19.7%), other services (19.3%), commerce and hospitality (19.1%), health (18.4%) and education (18.4%). Under-reporting decreased as injury severity increased, with little variations across sectors of economic activity.

CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest considerable under-reporting of OIs in Sweden and differential under-reporting by organisational factors. Results are relevant for official estimates of burden and for setting priorities for workplace safety and prevention.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume78
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)745-752
Number of pages8
ISSN1351-0711
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

    Research areas

  • Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Humans, Injury Severity Score, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Injuries/statistics & numerical data, Registries, Sweden/epidemiology, Workplace/organization & administration, Young Adult

ID: 327061877