Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals. / Andersen, Søren Stig.

In: Global Journal of Animal Law, Vol. 1/2015, 2015, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Andersen, SS 2015, 'Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals', Global Journal of Animal Law, vol. 1/2015, pp. 1-16. <file:///C:/Users/mck507/Downloads/1381-1-6622-1-10-20160120%20(1).pdf>

APA

Andersen, S. S. (2015). Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals. Global Journal of Animal Law, 1/2015, 1-16. file:///C:/Users/mck507/Downloads/1381-1-6622-1-10-20160120%20(1).pdf

Vancouver

Andersen SS. Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals. Global Journal of Animal Law. 2015;1/2015:1-16.

Author

Andersen, Søren Stig. / Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals. In: Global Journal of Animal Law. 2015 ; Vol. 1/2015. pp. 1-16.

Bibtex

@article{d3dd7ed8002d4729a3897647b31dbb3e,
title = "Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals",
abstract = "Whereas the continuous growth of legal animal protection true to the logic and self-understanding of law has been based on the rights discourse and its use of universal and uniform protection, the actual legal protection of an animal is to a wide extent determined by the purposes that underlie the human relation to the animal in question. In the present article, this discrepancy between appearance and reality is analysed on the basis of Levinasian ethics. Despite its great impact within other areas, hitherto Levinasian ethics has only been employed sparingly with regard to the ethical-legal status of animals. For this reason, special attention is paid to the challenges which appear to have obstructed past intentions to employ Levinas in the context of animal ethics. Furthermore, it will be suggested how a new theoretical approach based on Levinasian ethics may influence the direction and content of future research areas concerning legal protection of animals. The approach chosen in this article will point in the direction of an emphasized focus on the processes relating to the administration of legal protection of animals rather than on substantive provisions.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law, Dyrs rettigheder, dyreetik, procesret, Animal rights, ethical-legal status, relational ethics, Levinas, encounter, proximity",
author = "Andersen, {S{\o}ren Stig}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "1/2015",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Global Journal of Animal Law",
issn = "2341-8168",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proximity: A Levinasian Approach to Justice for Animals

AU - Andersen, Søren Stig

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Whereas the continuous growth of legal animal protection true to the logic and self-understanding of law has been based on the rights discourse and its use of universal and uniform protection, the actual legal protection of an animal is to a wide extent determined by the purposes that underlie the human relation to the animal in question. In the present article, this discrepancy between appearance and reality is analysed on the basis of Levinasian ethics. Despite its great impact within other areas, hitherto Levinasian ethics has only been employed sparingly with regard to the ethical-legal status of animals. For this reason, special attention is paid to the challenges which appear to have obstructed past intentions to employ Levinas in the context of animal ethics. Furthermore, it will be suggested how a new theoretical approach based on Levinasian ethics may influence the direction and content of future research areas concerning legal protection of animals. The approach chosen in this article will point in the direction of an emphasized focus on the processes relating to the administration of legal protection of animals rather than on substantive provisions.

AB - Whereas the continuous growth of legal animal protection true to the logic and self-understanding of law has been based on the rights discourse and its use of universal and uniform protection, the actual legal protection of an animal is to a wide extent determined by the purposes that underlie the human relation to the animal in question. In the present article, this discrepancy between appearance and reality is analysed on the basis of Levinasian ethics. Despite its great impact within other areas, hitherto Levinasian ethics has only been employed sparingly with regard to the ethical-legal status of animals. For this reason, special attention is paid to the challenges which appear to have obstructed past intentions to employ Levinas in the context of animal ethics. Furthermore, it will be suggested how a new theoretical approach based on Levinasian ethics may influence the direction and content of future research areas concerning legal protection of animals. The approach chosen in this article will point in the direction of an emphasized focus on the processes relating to the administration of legal protection of animals rather than on substantive provisions.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - Dyrs rettigheder

KW - dyreetik

KW - procesret

KW - Animal rights

KW - ethical-legal status

KW - relational ethics

KW - Levinas

KW - encounter

KW - proximity

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1/2015

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Global Journal of Animal Law

JF - Global Journal of Animal Law

SN - 2341-8168

ER -

ID: 228252082