Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry. / Usynin, Maxim.

In: Journal of International Maritime Law, Vol. 26, No. 5, 12.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Usynin, M 2020, 'Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry', Journal of International Maritime Law, vol. 26, no. 5.

APA

Usynin, M. (2020). Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry. Journal of International Maritime Law, 26(5).

Vancouver

Usynin M. Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry. Journal of International Maritime Law. 2020 Dec;26(5).

Author

Usynin, Maxim. / Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry. In: Journal of International Maritime Law. 2020 ; Vol. 26, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{a6e5402d879d4b2895eb73936a69fed6,
title = "Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry",
abstract = "The regulation of private activities that take place overseas has received significant attention in the legal scholarship. The traditional discussion of the topic observes such regulation from the perspectives of public international law principles of jurisdiction or private international law conflict of laws rules. The present article contributes to the discussion from the perspective of private parties engaged in shipping activities, who face an increasing need of compliance with different regulatory acts of extraterritorial application. It argues that the proliferation of such acts incentivizes private parties to include regulatory interests in their business activities.The article further suggests that extraterritorial regulation can serve as a trigger for transfer and intrinsic adoption of state{\textquoteright}s regulatory interest by private parties. It observes the examples of such {\textquoteleft}privatization of extraterritoriality{\textquoteright} in corporate compliance policies and contractual CSR clauses used by shipping companies, noting their spillover effects over other parties. It further notes that the proliferation of extraterritorial regulation sometimes results in the universalization of responses from private parties, as acquisition of regulatory interest untied from its nation-state origins. The concluding section puts the observed phenomenon into a broader picture, discussing the contribution of extraterritorial regulation to the mechanisms of private governance.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law, extraterritorial regulation, prescriptive jurisdiction, private law, conflict of laws, privatization of extraterritoriality, maritime law, compliance, private governance",
author = "Maxim Usynin",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
language = "English",
volume = "26",
journal = "Journal of International Maritime Law",
issn = "1478-8586",
publisher = "Lawtext Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sailing in All Winds: Extraterritorial Regulation as a Trigger for Self-Regulatory Practices in Shipping Industry

AU - Usynin, Maxim

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - The regulation of private activities that take place overseas has received significant attention in the legal scholarship. The traditional discussion of the topic observes such regulation from the perspectives of public international law principles of jurisdiction or private international law conflict of laws rules. The present article contributes to the discussion from the perspective of private parties engaged in shipping activities, who face an increasing need of compliance with different regulatory acts of extraterritorial application. It argues that the proliferation of such acts incentivizes private parties to include regulatory interests in their business activities.The article further suggests that extraterritorial regulation can serve as a trigger for transfer and intrinsic adoption of state’s regulatory interest by private parties. It observes the examples of such ‘privatization of extraterritoriality’ in corporate compliance policies and contractual CSR clauses used by shipping companies, noting their spillover effects over other parties. It further notes that the proliferation of extraterritorial regulation sometimes results in the universalization of responses from private parties, as acquisition of regulatory interest untied from its nation-state origins. The concluding section puts the observed phenomenon into a broader picture, discussing the contribution of extraterritorial regulation to the mechanisms of private governance.

AB - The regulation of private activities that take place overseas has received significant attention in the legal scholarship. The traditional discussion of the topic observes such regulation from the perspectives of public international law principles of jurisdiction or private international law conflict of laws rules. The present article contributes to the discussion from the perspective of private parties engaged in shipping activities, who face an increasing need of compliance with different regulatory acts of extraterritorial application. It argues that the proliferation of such acts incentivizes private parties to include regulatory interests in their business activities.The article further suggests that extraterritorial regulation can serve as a trigger for transfer and intrinsic adoption of state’s regulatory interest by private parties. It observes the examples of such ‘privatization of extraterritoriality’ in corporate compliance policies and contractual CSR clauses used by shipping companies, noting their spillover effects over other parties. It further notes that the proliferation of extraterritorial regulation sometimes results in the universalization of responses from private parties, as acquisition of regulatory interest untied from its nation-state origins. The concluding section puts the observed phenomenon into a broader picture, discussing the contribution of extraterritorial regulation to the mechanisms of private governance.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - extraterritorial regulation

KW - prescriptive jurisdiction

KW - private law

KW - conflict of laws

KW - privatization of extraterritoriality

KW - maritime law

KW - compliance

KW - private governance

UR - http://ssrn.com/abstract=3737663

UR - https://www.lawtext.com/publication/the-journal-of-international-maritime-law/contents/volume-26/issue-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

JO - Journal of International Maritime Law

JF - Journal of International Maritime Law

SN - 1478-8586

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 252071222