The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

Standard

The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality. / Thielmann, Isabel; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo.

In: Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 43, 02.2022, p. 289-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

Harvard

Thielmann, I, Hilbig, BE & Zettler, I 2022, 'The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality', Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 43, pp. 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009

APA

Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2022). The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009

Vancouver

Thielmann I, Hilbig BE, Zettler I. The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022 Feb;43:289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009

Author

Thielmann, Isabel ; Hilbig, Benjamin E. ; Zettler, Ingo. / The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality. In: Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022 ; Vol. 43. pp. 289-294.

Bibtex

@article{629c009ef7704a30855038b0aa0935a4,
title = "The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality",
abstract = "Individual differences in prosocial behavior have been consistently observed in a variety of contexts. Here, we summarize and critically discuss recent developments in two research agendas on the dispositional basis of human prosociality: a personality approach, proposing a variety of trait concepts and corresponding measures to predict prosocial behavior in different situations; and a behavioral consistency approach, testing for consistency in prosocial behaviors and its underlying latent disposition(s) across situations. Drawing on different properties of situations (so-called situational affordances), we outline a theoretical framework that can help integrate these so far hardly connected research agendas. We also point out limitations of prior research, such as a lack of theory, and provide suggestions on how to overcome them.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Personality traits, Prosocial behavior, Behavioral consistency, Cooperative phenotype, Affordances",
author = "Isabel Thielmann and Hilbig, {Benjamin E.} and Ingo Zettler",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "289--294",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychology",
issn = "2352-250X",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd. * Current Opinion Journals",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Dispositional Basis of Human Prosociality

AU - Thielmann, Isabel

AU - Hilbig, Benjamin E.

AU - Zettler, Ingo

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - Individual differences in prosocial behavior have been consistently observed in a variety of contexts. Here, we summarize and critically discuss recent developments in two research agendas on the dispositional basis of human prosociality: a personality approach, proposing a variety of trait concepts and corresponding measures to predict prosocial behavior in different situations; and a behavioral consistency approach, testing for consistency in prosocial behaviors and its underlying latent disposition(s) across situations. Drawing on different properties of situations (so-called situational affordances), we outline a theoretical framework that can help integrate these so far hardly connected research agendas. We also point out limitations of prior research, such as a lack of theory, and provide suggestions on how to overcome them.

AB - Individual differences in prosocial behavior have been consistently observed in a variety of contexts. Here, we summarize and critically discuss recent developments in two research agendas on the dispositional basis of human prosociality: a personality approach, proposing a variety of trait concepts and corresponding measures to predict prosocial behavior in different situations; and a behavioral consistency approach, testing for consistency in prosocial behaviors and its underlying latent disposition(s) across situations. Drawing on different properties of situations (so-called situational affordances), we outline a theoretical framework that can help integrate these so far hardly connected research agendas. We also point out limitations of prior research, such as a lack of theory, and provide suggestions on how to overcome them.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Personality traits

KW - Prosocial behavior

KW - Behavioral consistency

KW - Cooperative phenotype

KW - Affordances

UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009

U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009

DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.009

M3 - Review

C2 - 34509969

VL - 43

SP - 289

EP - 294

JO - Current Opinion in Psychology

JF - Current Opinion in Psychology

SN - 2352-250X

ER -

ID: 276700478