The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice: The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice : The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle. / Hansen, Christel N.; Hansen, Dorte Gilså; Kragstrup, Jakob; Busch, Ole.

In: Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2003, p. 225-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, CN, Hansen, DG, Kragstrup, J & Busch, O 2003, 'The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice: The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle', Quality in Primary Care, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 225-231.

APA

Hansen, C. N., Hansen, D. G., Kragstrup, J., & Busch, O. (2003). The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice: The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle. Quality in Primary Care, 11(3), 225-231.

Vancouver

Hansen CN, Hansen DG, Kragstrup J, Busch O. The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice: The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle. Quality in Primary Care. 2003;11(3):225-231.

Author

Hansen, Christel N. ; Hansen, Dorte Gilså ; Kragstrup, Jakob ; Busch, Ole. / The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice : The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle. In: Quality in Primary Care. 2003 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 225-231.

Bibtex

@article{e4a3251537e64ae1b88630924883a1b0,
title = "The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice: The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle",
abstract = "Aim: To describe and improve the quality of diabetes care in general practice. Setting: General practices in Ribe County, Denmark Design and methods: A medical two pass multipractice audit circle including feedback and continuing medical education following the principles of the Audit Project Odense (APO) method. The intervention was aimed at improving the delivery of diabetes care in general practice, with focus on performance of clinical measurements, laboratory tests and referral of patients with diabetes to treatment and control by specialists. Results: Delivery of diabetes care in general practice has not always met standards of care and variation between general practitioners is wide. Completion of the APO circle significantly increased the relative frequency of HbA1C testing from 52% to 67%, albumine-to-creatinine ratio testing from 6% to 15% and the use of microalbumin dipstick from 6% to 17% per general practitioner. Referral of patients to treatment and control by ophthalmologists, endocrinologists in diabetes outpatient clinics or chiropodists was significantly increased from 48% to 56%, from 2% to 11% and from 5% to 24%, respectively. Conclusion: Performance of diabetes care in general practice is highly variable and leaves room for quality improvement. Standards of diabetes care can be improved by a combination of audit, feedback and prolonged medical education following the principles of the Audit Project Odense (APO) method.",
keywords = "Audit, Clinical Audit, Diabetes, General practice, Multipractice",
author = "Hansen, {Christel N.} and Hansen, {Dorte Gils{\aa}} and Jakob Kragstrup and Ole Busch",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "225--231",
journal = "Quality in Primary Care",
issn = "1479-1072",
publisher = "Radcliffe Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of the APO method in improving diabetes care in general practice

T2 - The results of a Danish prospective multipractice audit circle

AU - Hansen, Christel N.

AU - Hansen, Dorte Gilså

AU - Kragstrup, Jakob

AU - Busch, Ole

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Aim: To describe and improve the quality of diabetes care in general practice. Setting: General practices in Ribe County, Denmark Design and methods: A medical two pass multipractice audit circle including feedback and continuing medical education following the principles of the Audit Project Odense (APO) method. The intervention was aimed at improving the delivery of diabetes care in general practice, with focus on performance of clinical measurements, laboratory tests and referral of patients with diabetes to treatment and control by specialists. Results: Delivery of diabetes care in general practice has not always met standards of care and variation between general practitioners is wide. Completion of the APO circle significantly increased the relative frequency of HbA1C testing from 52% to 67%, albumine-to-creatinine ratio testing from 6% to 15% and the use of microalbumin dipstick from 6% to 17% per general practitioner. Referral of patients to treatment and control by ophthalmologists, endocrinologists in diabetes outpatient clinics or chiropodists was significantly increased from 48% to 56%, from 2% to 11% and from 5% to 24%, respectively. Conclusion: Performance of diabetes care in general practice is highly variable and leaves room for quality improvement. Standards of diabetes care can be improved by a combination of audit, feedback and prolonged medical education following the principles of the Audit Project Odense (APO) method.

AB - Aim: To describe and improve the quality of diabetes care in general practice. Setting: General practices in Ribe County, Denmark Design and methods: A medical two pass multipractice audit circle including feedback and continuing medical education following the principles of the Audit Project Odense (APO) method. The intervention was aimed at improving the delivery of diabetes care in general practice, with focus on performance of clinical measurements, laboratory tests and referral of patients with diabetes to treatment and control by specialists. Results: Delivery of diabetes care in general practice has not always met standards of care and variation between general practitioners is wide. Completion of the APO circle significantly increased the relative frequency of HbA1C testing from 52% to 67%, albumine-to-creatinine ratio testing from 6% to 15% and the use of microalbumin dipstick from 6% to 17% per general practitioner. Referral of patients to treatment and control by ophthalmologists, endocrinologists in diabetes outpatient clinics or chiropodists was significantly increased from 48% to 56%, from 2% to 11% and from 5% to 24%, respectively. Conclusion: Performance of diabetes care in general practice is highly variable and leaves room for quality improvement. Standards of diabetes care can be improved by a combination of audit, feedback and prolonged medical education following the principles of the Audit Project Odense (APO) method.

KW - Audit

KW - Clinical Audit

KW - Diabetes

KW - General practice

KW - Multipractice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142106402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0142106402

VL - 11

SP - 225

EP - 231

JO - Quality in Primary Care

JF - Quality in Primary Care

SN - 1479-1072

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 324421847