The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination. / Grünbaum, Thor.

In: Synthese, Vol. 198, 07.2021, p. 4045-4068.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Grünbaum, T 2021, 'The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination', Synthese, vol. 198, pp. 4045-4068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01984-y

APA

Grünbaum, T. (2021). The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination. Synthese, 198, 4045-4068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01984-y

Vancouver

Grünbaum T. The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination. Synthese. 2021 Jul;198:4045-4068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01984-y

Author

Grünbaum, Thor. / The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination. In: Synthese. 2021 ; Vol. 198. pp. 4045-4068.

Bibtex

@article{9082019f2bfd4ebb80b3b79ff493ff87,
title = "The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination",
abstract = "This paper concerns local yet systematic problems of contrastive underdetermination of model choice in cognitive neuroscience debates about the so-called two visual systems hypothesis. The underdetermination problem is systematically generated by the way certain assumptions about the representationalist nature of computation are translated into experimental practice. The problem is that behavioural data underdetermine the choice between competing representational models. In this paper, I diagnose how these assumptions generate underdetermination problems in the choice between competing functional models of perception– action. Using the tools of philosophy of science, I describe the type of underdetermination and sketch a possible cure.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Two visual systems hypothesis, Underdetermination, Philosophy of science, Philosophy of cognitive neuroscience, Model choice",
author = "Thor Gr{\"u}nbaum",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1007/s11229-018-01984-y",
language = "English",
volume = "198",
pages = "4045--4068",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis and Contrastive Underdetermination

AU - Grünbaum, Thor

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - This paper concerns local yet systematic problems of contrastive underdetermination of model choice in cognitive neuroscience debates about the so-called two visual systems hypothesis. The underdetermination problem is systematically generated by the way certain assumptions about the representationalist nature of computation are translated into experimental practice. The problem is that behavioural data underdetermine the choice between competing representational models. In this paper, I diagnose how these assumptions generate underdetermination problems in the choice between competing functional models of perception– action. Using the tools of philosophy of science, I describe the type of underdetermination and sketch a possible cure.

AB - This paper concerns local yet systematic problems of contrastive underdetermination of model choice in cognitive neuroscience debates about the so-called two visual systems hypothesis. The underdetermination problem is systematically generated by the way certain assumptions about the representationalist nature of computation are translated into experimental practice. The problem is that behavioural data underdetermine the choice between competing representational models. In this paper, I diagnose how these assumptions generate underdetermination problems in the choice between competing functional models of perception– action. Using the tools of philosophy of science, I describe the type of underdetermination and sketch a possible cure.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Two visual systems hypothesis

KW - Underdetermination

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Philosophy of cognitive neuroscience

KW - Model choice

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-018-01984-y

DO - 10.1007/s11229-018-01984-y

M3 - Journal article

VL - 198

SP - 4045

EP - 4068

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

ER -

ID: 204196781