What the doctor doesn’t know: Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

What the doctor doesn’t know : Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity. / Joensson, Alexandra B.Ryborg; Guassora, Ann Dorrit; Freil, Morten; Reventlow, Susanne.

In: Chronic Illness, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2020, p. 212-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Joensson, ABR, Guassora, AD, Freil, M & Reventlow, S 2020, 'What the doctor doesn’t know: Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity', Chronic Illness, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395318796173

APA

Joensson, A. B. R., Guassora, A. D., Freil, M., & Reventlow, S. (2020). What the doctor doesn’t know: Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity. Chronic Illness, 16(3), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395318796173

Vancouver

Joensson ABR, Guassora AD, Freil M, Reventlow S. What the doctor doesn’t know: Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity. Chronic Illness. 2020;16(3):212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395318796173

Author

Joensson, Alexandra B.Ryborg ; Guassora, Ann Dorrit ; Freil, Morten ; Reventlow, Susanne. / What the doctor doesn’t know : Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity. In: Chronic Illness. 2020 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 212-225.

Bibtex

@article{719ccb10c7f04b5ebb4c7a54b00a6530,
title = "What the doctor doesn{\textquoteright}t know: Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity",
abstract = "Objectives: Adherence to treatment has proven to require the involvement of patients in treatment and care planning. This process involves incorporating patient knowledge, or knowledge about the patients{\textquoteright} everyday life, into the clinical encounter. This article explores the disclosure practices of such knowledge from older adults with multimorbidity. Methods: This was an 18-month qualitative study among 14 older adults with multimorbidity living in Denmark. A thematic analysis was applied, focusing on perceptions of patient knowledge and disclosure practices among the participating patients. Results: Older adults with multimorbidity have various reasons for not disclosing personal knowledge. The results present three different domains of what we termed discarded patient knowledge: (1) knowledge that had no direct biomedical relevance from participants{\textquoteright} perspective; (2) knowledge considered too private; and (3) knowledge assumed to position one as inferior. Discussion: The participants made judgments on what they believed was welcome in the clinical encounter, framing their knowledge within the purview of biomedicine. Participants{\textquoteright} disclosure practices showed that personal knowledge is sometimes not recognized as important for health and care by participants themselves. Knowledge that could have influenced practitioners{\textquoteright} understanding of the problem and provided different solutions, is argued to be discarded patient knowledge.",
keywords = "aging, multimorbidity, patient communication, patient involvement, Patient knowledge",
author = "Joensson, {Alexandra B.Ryborg} and Guassora, {Ann Dorrit} and Morten Freil and Susanne Reventlow",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1177/1742395318796173",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "212--225",
journal = "Chronic Illness",
issn = "1742-3953",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What the doctor doesn’t know

T2 - Discarded patient knowledge of older adults with multimorbidity

AU - Joensson, Alexandra B.Ryborg

AU - Guassora, Ann Dorrit

AU - Freil, Morten

AU - Reventlow, Susanne

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objectives: Adherence to treatment has proven to require the involvement of patients in treatment and care planning. This process involves incorporating patient knowledge, or knowledge about the patients’ everyday life, into the clinical encounter. This article explores the disclosure practices of such knowledge from older adults with multimorbidity. Methods: This was an 18-month qualitative study among 14 older adults with multimorbidity living in Denmark. A thematic analysis was applied, focusing on perceptions of patient knowledge and disclosure practices among the participating patients. Results: Older adults with multimorbidity have various reasons for not disclosing personal knowledge. The results present three different domains of what we termed discarded patient knowledge: (1) knowledge that had no direct biomedical relevance from participants’ perspective; (2) knowledge considered too private; and (3) knowledge assumed to position one as inferior. Discussion: The participants made judgments on what they believed was welcome in the clinical encounter, framing their knowledge within the purview of biomedicine. Participants’ disclosure practices showed that personal knowledge is sometimes not recognized as important for health and care by participants themselves. Knowledge that could have influenced practitioners’ understanding of the problem and provided different solutions, is argued to be discarded patient knowledge.

AB - Objectives: Adherence to treatment has proven to require the involvement of patients in treatment and care planning. This process involves incorporating patient knowledge, or knowledge about the patients’ everyday life, into the clinical encounter. This article explores the disclosure practices of such knowledge from older adults with multimorbidity. Methods: This was an 18-month qualitative study among 14 older adults with multimorbidity living in Denmark. A thematic analysis was applied, focusing on perceptions of patient knowledge and disclosure practices among the participating patients. Results: Older adults with multimorbidity have various reasons for not disclosing personal knowledge. The results present three different domains of what we termed discarded patient knowledge: (1) knowledge that had no direct biomedical relevance from participants’ perspective; (2) knowledge considered too private; and (3) knowledge assumed to position one as inferior. Discussion: The participants made judgments on what they believed was welcome in the clinical encounter, framing their knowledge within the purview of biomedicine. Participants’ disclosure practices showed that personal knowledge is sometimes not recognized as important for health and care by participants themselves. Knowledge that could have influenced practitioners’ understanding of the problem and provided different solutions, is argued to be discarded patient knowledge.

KW - aging

KW - multimorbidity

KW - patient communication

KW - patient involvement

KW - Patient knowledge

U2 - 10.1177/1742395318796173

DO - 10.1177/1742395318796173

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30213205

AN - SCOPUS:85058527325

VL - 16

SP - 212

EP - 225

JO - Chronic Illness

JF - Chronic Illness

SN - 1742-3953

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 213854457