Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial. / Barhoma, Maria; Sonne, Charlotte; Lommen, Miriam J.J.; Mortensen, Erik Lykke; Carlsson, Jessica.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 294, 2021, p. 628-637.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Barhoma, M, Sonne, C, Lommen, MJJ, Mortensen, EL & Carlsson, J 2021, 'Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial', Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 294, pp. 628-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.007

APA

Barhoma, M., Sonne, C., Lommen, M. J. J., Mortensen, E. L., & Carlsson, J. (2021). Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 294, 628-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.007

Vancouver

Barhoma M, Sonne C, Lommen MJJ, Mortensen EL, Carlsson J. Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021;294:628-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.007

Author

Barhoma, Maria ; Sonne, Charlotte ; Lommen, Miriam J.J. ; Mortensen, Erik Lykke ; Carlsson, Jessica. / Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial. In: Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021 ; Vol. 294. pp. 628-637.

Bibtex

@article{a066a083f256407c8973b387347d57a5,
title = "Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial",
abstract = "Background: There is a lack of research and consensus with respect to long-term effective treatments for trauma-affected refugees. The purpose of this follow-up study of a randomised clinical trial was to investigate the effectiveness of Stress Management (SM) versus Cognitive Restructuring (CR) in treating trauma-affected refugees, six and 18 months post-treatment, respectively. Methods: From a total of 126 refugees with PTSD, the intention-to-treat sample in the original trial, 74 patients were present at the six-month follow-up (SM; n = 37, CR; n = 37) and 34 patients at the 18-month follow-up (SM; n = 14, CR; n = 20). During the trial, the patients had been offered a total of 16 psychotherapy sessions and 10 sessions with a medical doctor. Results: Mixed regression analyses at six and 18-month follow-up showed a non-significant small reduction in PTSD symptoms at both follow-up points with no significant between-group differences between the two psychotherapeutic interventions. Statistically significant between-group treatment effects were, however, observed with the patients receiving SM having significantly reduced symptoms of somatisation measured by the Symptom Checklist (β = 0.40), depression (β = 0.29) and anxiety (β = 0.37) (measured by the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety ratings) at 18 months post-treatment compared to the CR group. Limitations: Limitations to the present study include the dropout rate at follow-up(s). Conclusions: The findings suggest that the consolidation of coping strategies including relaxation, attention-diversion and behavioural activation in SM appears to be more beneficial than CR in reducing long-term somatisation, depression and anxiety symptoms for this population.",
keywords = "Psychotherapy, PTSD, refugees, Stress Management, trauma",
author = "Maria Barhoma and Charlotte Sonne and Lommen, {Miriam J.J.} and Mortensen, {Erik Lykke} and Jessica Carlsson",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "294",
pages = "628--637",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress management versus cognitive restructuring in trauma-affected refugees — A follow-up study on a pragmatic randomised trial

AU - Barhoma, Maria

AU - Sonne, Charlotte

AU - Lommen, Miriam J.J.

AU - Mortensen, Erik Lykke

AU - Carlsson, Jessica

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: There is a lack of research and consensus with respect to long-term effective treatments for trauma-affected refugees. The purpose of this follow-up study of a randomised clinical trial was to investigate the effectiveness of Stress Management (SM) versus Cognitive Restructuring (CR) in treating trauma-affected refugees, six and 18 months post-treatment, respectively. Methods: From a total of 126 refugees with PTSD, the intention-to-treat sample in the original trial, 74 patients were present at the six-month follow-up (SM; n = 37, CR; n = 37) and 34 patients at the 18-month follow-up (SM; n = 14, CR; n = 20). During the trial, the patients had been offered a total of 16 psychotherapy sessions and 10 sessions with a medical doctor. Results: Mixed regression analyses at six and 18-month follow-up showed a non-significant small reduction in PTSD symptoms at both follow-up points with no significant between-group differences between the two psychotherapeutic interventions. Statistically significant between-group treatment effects were, however, observed with the patients receiving SM having significantly reduced symptoms of somatisation measured by the Symptom Checklist (β = 0.40), depression (β = 0.29) and anxiety (β = 0.37) (measured by the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety ratings) at 18 months post-treatment compared to the CR group. Limitations: Limitations to the present study include the dropout rate at follow-up(s). Conclusions: The findings suggest that the consolidation of coping strategies including relaxation, attention-diversion and behavioural activation in SM appears to be more beneficial than CR in reducing long-term somatisation, depression and anxiety symptoms for this population.

AB - Background: There is a lack of research and consensus with respect to long-term effective treatments for trauma-affected refugees. The purpose of this follow-up study of a randomised clinical trial was to investigate the effectiveness of Stress Management (SM) versus Cognitive Restructuring (CR) in treating trauma-affected refugees, six and 18 months post-treatment, respectively. Methods: From a total of 126 refugees with PTSD, the intention-to-treat sample in the original trial, 74 patients were present at the six-month follow-up (SM; n = 37, CR; n = 37) and 34 patients at the 18-month follow-up (SM; n = 14, CR; n = 20). During the trial, the patients had been offered a total of 16 psychotherapy sessions and 10 sessions with a medical doctor. Results: Mixed regression analyses at six and 18-month follow-up showed a non-significant small reduction in PTSD symptoms at both follow-up points with no significant between-group differences between the two psychotherapeutic interventions. Statistically significant between-group treatment effects were, however, observed with the patients receiving SM having significantly reduced symptoms of somatisation measured by the Symptom Checklist (β = 0.40), depression (β = 0.29) and anxiety (β = 0.37) (measured by the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety ratings) at 18 months post-treatment compared to the CR group. Limitations: Limitations to the present study include the dropout rate at follow-up(s). Conclusions: The findings suggest that the consolidation of coping strategies including relaxation, attention-diversion and behavioural activation in SM appears to be more beneficial than CR in reducing long-term somatisation, depression and anxiety symptoms for this population.

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - PTSD

KW - refugees

KW - Stress Management

KW - trauma

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.007

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34332363

AN - SCOPUS:85111337715

VL - 294

SP - 628

EP - 637

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -

ID: 275882776