Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample: a cross-sectional community

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample : a cross-sectional community. / Nielsen, Jannie; Bahendeka, Silver K.; Whyte, Susan R.; Meyrowitsch, Dan W.; Bygbjerg, Ib C.; Witte, Daniel R.

In: B M J Open, Vol. 7, No. 9, e015214, 01.09.2017, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, J, Bahendeka, SK, Whyte, SR, Meyrowitsch, DW, Bygbjerg, IC & Witte, DR 2017, 'Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample: a cross-sectional community' B M J Open, vol. 7, no. 9, e015214, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214

APA

Nielsen, J., Bahendeka, S. K., Whyte, S. R., Meyrowitsch, D. W., Bygbjerg, I. C., & Witte, D. R. (2017). Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample: a cross-sectional community. B M J Open, 7(9), 1-9. [e015214]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214

Vancouver

Nielsen J, Bahendeka SK, Whyte SR, Meyrowitsch DW, Bygbjerg IC, Witte DR. Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample: a cross-sectional community. B M J Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):1-9. e015214. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214

Author

Nielsen, Jannie ; Bahendeka, Silver K. ; Whyte, Susan R. ; Meyrowitsch, Dan W. ; Bygbjerg, Ib C. ; Witte, Daniel R. / Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample : a cross-sectional community. In: B M J Open. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 9. pp. 1-9.

Bibtex

@article{5973d6263b8d416f9f92c95dd4ecdb53,
title = "Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample: a cross-sectional community",
abstract = "Objectives: Prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been successfully established in randomised clinical trials. However, the best methods for the translation of this evidence into effective population-wide interventions remain unclear. To assess whether households could be a target for T2D prevention and screening, we investigated the resemblance of T2D risk factors at household level and by type of familial dyadic relationship in a rural Ugandan community.Methods: This cross-sectional household-based study included 437 individuals ≥13 years of age from 90 rural households in south-western Uganda. Resemblance in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), anthropometry, blood pressure, fitness status and sitting time were analysed using a general mixed model with random effects (by household or dyad) to calculate household intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and dyadic regression coefficients. Logistic regression with household as a random effect was used to calculate the ORs for individuals having a condition or risk factor if another household member had the same condition.Results The strongest degree of household member resemblances in T2D risk factors was seen in relation to fitness status (ICC=0.24), HbA1c (ICC=0.18) and systolic blood pressure (ICC=0.11). Regarding dyadic resemblance, the highest standardised regression coefficient was seen in fitness status for spouses (0.54, 95{\%} CI 0.32 to 0.76), parent–offspring (0.41, 95{\%} CI 0.28 0.54) and siblings (0.41, 95{\%} CI 0.25 to 0.57). Overall, parent–offspring and sibling pairs were the dyads with strongest resemblance, followed by spouses.Conclusions The marked degree of resemblance in T2D risk factors at household level and between spouses, parent–offspring and sibling dyads suggest that shared behavioural and environmental factors may influence risk factor levels among cohabiting individuals, which point to the potential of the household setting for screening and prevention of T2D.",
author = "Jannie Nielsen and Bahendeka, {Silver K.} and Whyte, {Susan R.} and Meyrowitsch, {Dan W.} and Bygbjerg, {Ib C.} and Witte, {Daniel R.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "B M J Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Household and familial resemblance in risk factors for type 2 diabetes and related cardiometabolic diseases in rural Uganda sample

T2 - a cross-sectional community

AU - Nielsen, Jannie

AU - Bahendeka, Silver K.

AU - Whyte, Susan R.

AU - Meyrowitsch, Dan W.

AU - Bygbjerg, Ib C.

AU - Witte, Daniel R.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Objectives: Prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been successfully established in randomised clinical trials. However, the best methods for the translation of this evidence into effective population-wide interventions remain unclear. To assess whether households could be a target for T2D prevention and screening, we investigated the resemblance of T2D risk factors at household level and by type of familial dyadic relationship in a rural Ugandan community.Methods: This cross-sectional household-based study included 437 individuals ≥13 years of age from 90 rural households in south-western Uganda. Resemblance in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), anthropometry, blood pressure, fitness status and sitting time were analysed using a general mixed model with random effects (by household or dyad) to calculate household intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and dyadic regression coefficients. Logistic regression with household as a random effect was used to calculate the ORs for individuals having a condition or risk factor if another household member had the same condition.Results The strongest degree of household member resemblances in T2D risk factors was seen in relation to fitness status (ICC=0.24), HbA1c (ICC=0.18) and systolic blood pressure (ICC=0.11). Regarding dyadic resemblance, the highest standardised regression coefficient was seen in fitness status for spouses (0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.76), parent–offspring (0.41, 95% CI 0.28 0.54) and siblings (0.41, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.57). Overall, parent–offspring and sibling pairs were the dyads with strongest resemblance, followed by spouses.Conclusions The marked degree of resemblance in T2D risk factors at household level and between spouses, parent–offspring and sibling dyads suggest that shared behavioural and environmental factors may influence risk factor levels among cohabiting individuals, which point to the potential of the household setting for screening and prevention of T2D.

AB - Objectives: Prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been successfully established in randomised clinical trials. However, the best methods for the translation of this evidence into effective population-wide interventions remain unclear. To assess whether households could be a target for T2D prevention and screening, we investigated the resemblance of T2D risk factors at household level and by type of familial dyadic relationship in a rural Ugandan community.Methods: This cross-sectional household-based study included 437 individuals ≥13 years of age from 90 rural households in south-western Uganda. Resemblance in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), anthropometry, blood pressure, fitness status and sitting time were analysed using a general mixed model with random effects (by household or dyad) to calculate household intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and dyadic regression coefficients. Logistic regression with household as a random effect was used to calculate the ORs for individuals having a condition or risk factor if another household member had the same condition.Results The strongest degree of household member resemblances in T2D risk factors was seen in relation to fitness status (ICC=0.24), HbA1c (ICC=0.18) and systolic blood pressure (ICC=0.11). Regarding dyadic resemblance, the highest standardised regression coefficient was seen in fitness status for spouses (0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.76), parent–offspring (0.41, 95% CI 0.28 0.54) and siblings (0.41, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.57). Overall, parent–offspring and sibling pairs were the dyads with strongest resemblance, followed by spouses.Conclusions The marked degree of resemblance in T2D risk factors at household level and between spouses, parent–offspring and sibling dyads suggest that shared behavioural and environmental factors may influence risk factor levels among cohabiting individuals, which point to the potential of the household setting for screening and prevention of T2D.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015214

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - B M J Open

JF - B M J Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e015214

ER -

ID: 185229262