A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients : A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. / Robinson, Sian; Zincuk, Aleksander; Larsen, Ulla Lei; Ekstrøm, Claus; Nybo, Mads; Rasmussen, Bjarne; Toft, Palle.

In: Critical Care, Vol. 17, No. 2, R75, 19.04.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Robinson, S, Zincuk, A, Larsen, UL, Ekstrøm, C, Nybo, M, Rasmussen, B & Toft, P 2013, 'A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial', Critical Care, vol. 17, no. 2, R75. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12684

APA

Robinson, S., Zincuk, A., Larsen, U. L., Ekstrøm, C., Nybo, M., Rasmussen, B., & Toft, P. (2013). A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Critical Care, 17(2), [R75]. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12684

Vancouver

Robinson S, Zincuk A, Larsen UL, Ekstrøm C, Nybo M, Rasmussen B et al. A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Critical Care. 2013 Apr 19;17(2). R75. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12684

Author

Robinson, Sian ; Zincuk, Aleksander ; Larsen, Ulla Lei ; Ekstrøm, Claus ; Nybo, Mads ; Rasmussen, Bjarne ; Toft, Palle. / A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients : A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. In: Critical Care. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{1c6fdfa20f0f4310876c496e4b6d802c,
title = "A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Introduction: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies.Methods: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter.Results: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects.Conclusions: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009.",
author = "Sian Robinson and Aleksander Zincuk and Larsen, {Ulla Lei} and Claus Ekstr{\o}m and Mads Nybo and Bjarne Rasmussen and Palle Toft",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/cc12684",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1364-8535",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of varying doses of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in critically ill patients

T2 - A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial

AU - Robinson, Sian

AU - Zincuk, Aleksander

AU - Larsen, Ulla Lei

AU - Ekstrøm, Claus

AU - Nybo, Mads

AU - Rasmussen, Bjarne

AU - Toft, Palle

PY - 2013/4/19

Y1 - 2013/4/19

N2 - Introduction: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies.Methods: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter.Results: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects.Conclusions: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009.

AB - Introduction: Critically ill patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism. We hypothesized that higher doses of enoxaparin would improve thromboprophylaxis without increasing the risk of bleeding. Peak anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels of 0.1 to 0.4 IU/ml reflect adequate thromboprophylaxis for general ward patients. Studies conducted in orthopaedic patients demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between anti-Xa levels and wound haematoma and thrombosis. Corresponding levels for critically ill patients may well be higher, but have never been validated in large studies.Methods: Eighty critically ill patients weighing 50 to 90 kilograms were randomised in a double-blinded study to receive subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin: 40 mg once daily (QD), 30 mg twice daily (BID), 40 mg BID, or 1 mg/kg QD, each administered for three days. Anti-Xa activity was measured at baseline, and daily at 4, 12, 16 and 24 hours post administration. Antithrombin, fibrinogen, and platelets were measured at baseline and twice daily thereafter.Results: Two patients were transferred prior to participation. On day 1, doses of 40 mg QD (n = 20) and 40 mg BID (n = 19) yielded mean peak anti-Xa of 0.20 IU/ml and 0.17 IU/ml respectively. A dose of 30 mg BID (n = 20) resulted in much lower levels (0.08 IU/ml). Patients receiving 1 mg/kg QD (n = 19) achieved near steady-state mean peak anti-Xa levels from day 1 (0.34 IU/ml). At steady state (day 3), mean peak anti-Xa levels of 0.13 IU/ml and 0.15 IU/ml were achieved with doses of 40 mg QD and 30 mg BID respectively. This increased significantly to 0.33 IU/ml and 0.40 IU/ml for doses of 40 mg BID and 1 mg/kg QD respectively. Thus anti-Xa response profiles differed significantly over the three days between enoxaparin treatment groups (P <0.0001). Doses of 40 mg BID and1 mg/kg QD enoxaparin yielded target anti-Xa levels for over 80% of the study period. There were no adverse effects.Conclusions: Doses of 40 mg QD enoxaparin (Europe) or 30 mg BID (North America) yield levels of anti-Xa which may be inadequate for critically ill patients. A weight-based dose yielded the best anti-Xa levels without bioaccumulation, and allowed the establishment of near steady-state levels from the first day of enoxaparin administration. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN91570009.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876292637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/cc12684

DO - 10.1186/cc12684

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23601744

AN - SCOPUS:84876292637

VL - 17

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1364-8535

IS - 2

M1 - R75

ER -

ID: 203908947