Analysing the Wrongness of Killing
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review
- Analysing the Wrongness of Killing
Final published version, 103 KB, PDF document
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the wrongness of killing by comparing different versions of three influential views: the traditional view that killing is always wrong; the liberal view that killing is wrong if and only if the victim does not want to be killed; and Don Marquis‟ future of value account of the wrongness of killing. In particular, I illustrate the advantages that a basic version of the liberal view and a basic version of the future of value account have over competing alternatives. Still, ultimately none of the views analysed here are satisfactory; but the different reasons why those competing views fail provide important insights into the ethics of killing.
|Number of pages||6|
|Publication status||Published - 2014|
Final published version