Empagliflozin cardiovascular and renal effectiveness and safety compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors across 11 countries in Europe and Asia: Results from the EMPagliflozin compaRative effectIveness and SafEty (EMPRISE) study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 4.46 MB, PDF document

  • Avraham Karasik
  • Stefanie Lanzinger
  • Elise Chia-Hui Tan
  • Daisuke Yabe
  • Dae Jung Kim
  • Wayne H.H. Sheu
  • Cheli Melzer-Cohen
  • Reinhard W. Holl
  • Kyoung Hwa Ha
  • Kamlesh Khunti
  • Francesco Zaccardi
  • Anuradhaa Subramanian
  • Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
  • Thomas Nyström
  • Leo Niskanen
  • Majken Linnemann Jensen
  • Fabian Hoti
  • Riho Klement
  • Anouk Déruaz-Luyet
  • Moe H. Kyaw
  • Lisette Koeneman
  • Dorte Vistisen
  • Carstensen, Bendix
  • Sigrun Halvorsen
  • Gisle Langslet
  • Soulmaz Fazeli Farsani
  • Elisabetta Patorno
  • Júlio Núñez
  • EMPRISE Europe and Asia Study Group

Background: Continued expansion of indications for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors increases importance of evaluating cardiovascular and kidney efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to similar therapies. Methods: The EMPRISE Europe and Asia study is a non-interventional cohort study using data from 2014–2019 in seven European (Denmark, Finland, Germany, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom) and four Asian (Israel, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) countries. Patients with type 2 diabetes initiating empagliflozin were 1:1 propensity score matched to patients initiating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Primary endpoints included hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. Other cardiovascular, renal, and safety outcomes were examined. Findings: Among 83,946 matched patient pairs, (0·7 years overall mean follow-up time), initiation of empagliflozin was associated with lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Hazard Ratio 0·70; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83). Risks of all-cause mortality (0·55; 0·48 to 0·63), stroke (0·82; 0·71 to 0·96), and end-stage renal disease (0·43; 0·30 to 0·63) were lower and risk for myocardial infarction, bone fracture, severe hypoglycemia, and lower-limb amputation were similar between initiators of empagliflozin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Initiation of empagliflozin was associated with higher risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (1·97; 1·28 to 3·03) compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Results were consistent across continents and regions. Interpretation: Results from this EMPRISE Europe and Asia study complements previous clinical trials and real-world studies by providing further evidence of the beneficial cardiorenal effects and overall safety of empagliflozin compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101418
JournalDiabetes and Metabolism
Volume49
Issue number2
Number of pages17
ISSN1262-3636
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

    Research areas

  • All-cause mortality, Cardiovascular diseases, Comparative effectiveness, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, Empagliflozin, Heart failure, Meta-analysis, Observational study, Pharmacoepidemiology, Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors

ID: 339547886