Evaluation of an integrated intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in refugees: Results from the Nguvu cluster randomized feasibility trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Evaluation of an integrated intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in refugees : Results from the Nguvu cluster randomized feasibility trial. / Greene, M. Claire; Likindikoki, Samuel; Rees, Susan; Bonz, Annie; Kaysen, Debra; Misinzo, Lusia; Njau, Tasiana; Kiluwa, Shangwe; Turner, Rachael; Ventevogel, Peter; Mbwambo, Jessie K. K.; Tol, Wietse A.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 16, No. 6, 0252982, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of an integrated intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in refugees
T2 - Results from the Nguvu cluster randomized feasibility trial
AU - Greene, M. Claire
AU - Likindikoki, Samuel
AU - Rees, Susan
AU - Bonz, Annie
AU - Kaysen, Debra
AU - Misinzo, Lusia
AU - Njau, Tasiana
AU - Kiluwa, Shangwe
AU - Turner, Rachael
AU - Ventevogel, Peter
AU - Mbwambo, Jessie K. K.
AU - Tol, Wietse A.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - IntroductionThe complex relationship between intimate partner violence and psychological distress warrants an integrated intervention approach. In this study we examined the relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of evaluating a multi-sectoral integrated violence- and mental health-focused intervention (Nguvu).MethodsWe enrolled 311 Congolese refugee women from Nyarugusu refugee camp in Tanzania with past-year intimate partner violence and elevated psychological distress in a feasibility cluster randomized trial. Women were recruited from local women's groups that were randomized to the Nguvu intervention or usual care. Participants from women's groups randomized to Nguvu received 8 weekly sessions delivered by lay refugee incentive workers. Psychological distress, intimate partner violence, other wellbeing, and process indicators were assessed at baseline and 9-weeks post-enrollment to evaluate relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of implementing and evaluating Nguvu in refugee contexts.ResultsWe found that Nguvu was relevant to the needs of refugee women affected by intimate partner violence. We found reductions in some indicators of psychological distress, but did not identify sizeable changes in partner violence over time. Overall, we found that Nguvu was acceptable and feasible. However, challenges to the research protocol included baseline imbalances between study conditions, differential intervention completion related to intimate partner violence histories, differences between Nguvu groups and facilitators, and some indication that Nguvu may be less beneficial for participants with more severe intimate partner violence profiles.ConclusionsWe found evidence supporting the relevance of Nguvu to refugee women affected by partner violence and psychological distress and moderate evidence supporting the acceptability and feasibility of evaluating and implementing this intervention in a complex refugee setting. A definitive cluster randomized trial requires further adaptations for recruitment and eligibility screening, randomization, and retention.
AB - IntroductionThe complex relationship between intimate partner violence and psychological distress warrants an integrated intervention approach. In this study we examined the relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of evaluating a multi-sectoral integrated violence- and mental health-focused intervention (Nguvu).MethodsWe enrolled 311 Congolese refugee women from Nyarugusu refugee camp in Tanzania with past-year intimate partner violence and elevated psychological distress in a feasibility cluster randomized trial. Women were recruited from local women's groups that were randomized to the Nguvu intervention or usual care. Participants from women's groups randomized to Nguvu received 8 weekly sessions delivered by lay refugee incentive workers. Psychological distress, intimate partner violence, other wellbeing, and process indicators were assessed at baseline and 9-weeks post-enrollment to evaluate relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of implementing and evaluating Nguvu in refugee contexts.ResultsWe found that Nguvu was relevant to the needs of refugee women affected by intimate partner violence. We found reductions in some indicators of psychological distress, but did not identify sizeable changes in partner violence over time. Overall, we found that Nguvu was acceptable and feasible. However, challenges to the research protocol included baseline imbalances between study conditions, differential intervention completion related to intimate partner violence histories, differences between Nguvu groups and facilitators, and some indication that Nguvu may be less beneficial for participants with more severe intimate partner violence profiles.ConclusionsWe found evidence supporting the relevance of Nguvu to refugee women affected by partner violence and psychological distress and moderate evidence supporting the acceptability and feasibility of evaluating and implementing this intervention in a complex refugee setting. A definitive cluster randomized trial requires further adaptations for recruitment and eligibility screening, randomization, and retention.
KW - MENTAL-HEALTH
KW - SEXUAL VIOLENCE
KW - WOMEN
KW - SURVIVORS
KW - ASSOCIATION
KW - CONFLICT
KW - TORTURE
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0252982
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0252982
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34143803
VL - 16
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 6
M1 - 0252982
ER -
ID: 274611453