High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in human papillomavirus self-sampling of screening non-attenders

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

J.U.H. Lam, K M Elfström, D. M. Ejegod, H. Pedersen, C. Rygaard, M. Rebolj, E Lynge, K. E. Juul, S. K. Kjær, J. Dillner, J. Bonde

BACKGROUND: Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) offered to women who do not participate in cervical cancer screening is an increasingly popular method to increase screening coverage. The rationale behind self-sampling is that unscreened women harbour a high proportion of undetected precancer lesions. Here, we compare the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (⩾CIN2) detection rate between non-attenders who participated in self-sampling and women attending routine screening.

METHODS: A total of 23 632 women who were qualified as non-attenders in the Copenhagen Region were invited for HPV-based self-sampling. Of these, 4824 women returned a self-sample, and HPV-positive women were referred for cytology and HPV co-testing as follow-up. The entire cohort and a reference cohort (3347 routinely screened women) were followed for histopathology confirmed ⩾CIN2. Odds ratio (OR) and the relative positive predictive value of ⩾CIN2 detection between the two populations were estimated.

RESULTS: Women participating in self-sampling had a higher ⩾CIN2 detection than women undergoing routine cytology-based screening (OR=1.83, 95% CI: 1.21-2.77) and a similar detection as routinely screened women tested with cytology and HPV testing (OR=1.03, 95% CI: 0.75-1.40). The positive predictive value for ⩾CIN2 was higher in screening non-attenders than in routinely HPV- and cytology-screened screened women (36.5% vs 25.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Self-sampling offered to non-attenders showed higher detection rates for ⩾CIN2 than routine cytology-based screening, and similar detection rates as HPV and cytology co-testing. This reinforces the importance of self-sampling for screening non-attenders in organised cervical cancer screening.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 14 November 2017; doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.371 www.bjcancer.com.

Original languageEnglish
JournalB J C
Volume118
Pages (from-to)138–144
Number of pages7
ISSN0007-0920
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Journal Article

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 185945587