Integrated care in a Beveridge system: experiences from England and Denmark
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Integrated care in a Beveridge system : experiences from England and Denmark. / Tsiachristas, Apostolos; Vrangbæk, Karsten; Gongora-Salazar, Pamela; Kristensen, Søren Rud.
In: Health Economics, Policy and Law, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2023, p. 345-361.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated care in a Beveridge system
T2 - experiences from England and Denmark
AU - Tsiachristas, Apostolos
AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten
AU - Gongora-Salazar, Pamela
AU - Kristensen, Søren Rud
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Health systems internationally face demands to deliver care that is better coordinated and integrated. The health system financing and delivery model may go some, but not all the way in explaining health system fragmentation. In this paper, we consider the road to care integration in two countries with Beveridge style health systems, England and Denmark, that are both ranked as highly Integrated systems in Toth's health integration index. We use the SELFIE framework to compare the policies and reforms that have affected care integration over the past 30 years in the two countries. The countries both started their reform path by reforming to introduce choice and competition, but did so in different ways that set them on different pathways. Nevertheless, after two decades, the countries ended the period with largely similar structures that emphasised the creation of a cross-sectoral governance structure. In the relatively centralised England, by introducing decentralised Integrated Care Systems, and in the relatively decentralised Denmark with a centralising element in the form of new Health Clusters.
AB - Health systems internationally face demands to deliver care that is better coordinated and integrated. The health system financing and delivery model may go some, but not all the way in explaining health system fragmentation. In this paper, we consider the road to care integration in two countries with Beveridge style health systems, England and Denmark, that are both ranked as highly Integrated systems in Toth's health integration index. We use the SELFIE framework to compare the policies and reforms that have affected care integration over the past 30 years in the two countries. The countries both started their reform path by reforming to introduce choice and competition, but did so in different ways that set them on different pathways. Nevertheless, after two decades, the countries ended the period with largely similar structures that emphasised the creation of a cross-sectoral governance structure. In the relatively centralised England, by introducing decentralised Integrated Care Systems, and in the relatively decentralised Denmark with a centralising element in the form of new Health Clusters.
KW - Humans
KW - Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
KW - Denmark
KW - England
KW - Health Care Reform
U2 - 10.1017/S1744133123000166
DO - 10.1017/S1744133123000166
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37827835
VL - 18
SP - 345
EP - 361
JO - Health Economics, Policy and Law
JF - Health Economics, Policy and Law
SN - 1744-1331
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 375134369