Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Opdam, Niek; van de Sande, Francoise ; Bronkhorst, Ewald ; Bottenberg, Peter ; Cenci, Maximiliano ; Gaengler, Peter ; Pallesen, Ulla; Lindberg, Anders ; Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte ; van Dijken, Jan WV.

In: Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 93, No. 10, 2014, p. 943-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Opdam, N, van de Sande, F, Bronkhorst, E, Bottenberg, P, Cenci, M, Gaengler, P, Pallesen, U, Lindberg, A, Huysmans, M-C & van Dijken, JWV 2014, 'Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis', Journal of Dental Research, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 943-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217

APA

Opdam, N., van de Sande, F., Bronkhorst, E., Bottenberg, P., Cenci, M., Gaengler, P., ... van Dijken, J. WV. (2014). Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 93(10), 943-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217

Vancouver

Opdam N, van de Sande F, Bronkhorst E, Bottenberg P, Cenci M, Gaengler P et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research. 2014;93(10):943-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217

Author

Opdam, Niek ; van de Sande, Francoise ; Bronkhorst, Ewald ; Bottenberg, Peter ; Cenci, Maximiliano ; Gaengler, Peter ; Pallesen, Ulla ; Lindberg, Anders ; Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte ; van Dijken, Jan WV. / Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Dental Research. 2014 ; Vol. 93, No. 10. pp. 943-49.

Bibtex

@article{2206fa8571104bf5b5f3a01378b47c2a,
title = "Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "The aim of this meta-analysis, based on individual participant data ofseveral studies, was to investigate the influence of patient, materials andtooth related variables on the survival of posterior resin compositerestorations.Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines a search was conducted resulting in12 longitudinal studies of direct posterior resin composite restorations withat least 5 years follow-up. Original datasets were still available, includingplacement/failure/censoring of restorations, restored surfaces, materialsused, reasons for clinical failure, and caries-risk status. A databaseincluding all restorations was constructed and a Multivariate Cox’sregression method was used to analyze variables of interest [patient (age;gender; caries-risk-status), jaw (upper; lower), number of restoredsurfaces, resin composite and adhesive materials and use of glass-ionomercement as base/liner (present or absent)] The Hazard Ratios withrespective 95{\%} confidence intervals were determined and annual failurerates were calculated for subgroups.Results: 2816 restorations (2585 Class II and 231 class I restorations)were included in the analysis, of which 569 failed during the observationperiod. Main reasons for failure were caries and fracture. The regressionanalyses showed a significantly higher risk of failure for restorations in highcaries risk individuals and with a higher number of restored surfaces.",
keywords = "Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Composite materials, Restorative materials, Risk factor(s), Operative",
author = "Niek Opdam and {van de Sande}, Francoise and Ewald Bronkhorst and Peter Bottenberg and Maximiliano Cenci and Peter Gaengler and Ulla Pallesen and Anders Lindberg and Marie-Charlotte Huysmans and {van Dijken}, {Jan WV}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0022034514544217",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "943--49",
journal = "Journal of Dental Research",
issn = "0022-0345",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Opdam, Niek

AU - van de Sande, Francoise

AU - Bronkhorst, Ewald

AU - Bottenberg, Peter

AU - Cenci, Maximiliano

AU - Gaengler, Peter

AU - Pallesen, Ulla

AU - Lindberg, Anders

AU - Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte

AU - van Dijken, Jan WV

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The aim of this meta-analysis, based on individual participant data ofseveral studies, was to investigate the influence of patient, materials andtooth related variables on the survival of posterior resin compositerestorations.Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines a search was conducted resulting in12 longitudinal studies of direct posterior resin composite restorations withat least 5 years follow-up. Original datasets were still available, includingplacement/failure/censoring of restorations, restored surfaces, materialsused, reasons for clinical failure, and caries-risk status. A databaseincluding all restorations was constructed and a Multivariate Cox’sregression method was used to analyze variables of interest [patient (age;gender; caries-risk-status), jaw (upper; lower), number of restoredsurfaces, resin composite and adhesive materials and use of glass-ionomercement as base/liner (present or absent)] The Hazard Ratios withrespective 95% confidence intervals were determined and annual failurerates were calculated for subgroups.Results: 2816 restorations (2585 Class II and 231 class I restorations)were included in the analysis, of which 569 failed during the observationperiod. Main reasons for failure were caries and fracture. The regressionanalyses showed a significantly higher risk of failure for restorations in highcaries risk individuals and with a higher number of restored surfaces.

AB - The aim of this meta-analysis, based on individual participant data ofseveral studies, was to investigate the influence of patient, materials andtooth related variables on the survival of posterior resin compositerestorations.Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines a search was conducted resulting in12 longitudinal studies of direct posterior resin composite restorations withat least 5 years follow-up. Original datasets were still available, includingplacement/failure/censoring of restorations, restored surfaces, materialsused, reasons for clinical failure, and caries-risk status. A databaseincluding all restorations was constructed and a Multivariate Cox’sregression method was used to analyze variables of interest [patient (age;gender; caries-risk-status), jaw (upper; lower), number of restoredsurfaces, resin composite and adhesive materials and use of glass-ionomercement as base/liner (present or absent)] The Hazard Ratios withrespective 95% confidence intervals were determined and annual failurerates were calculated for subgroups.Results: 2816 restorations (2585 Class II and 231 class I restorations)were included in the analysis, of which 569 failed during the observationperiod. Main reasons for failure were caries and fracture. The regressionanalyses showed a significantly higher risk of failure for restorations in highcaries risk individuals and with a higher number of restored surfaces.

KW - Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences

KW - Composite materials, Restorative materials, Risk factor(s), Operative

U2 - 10.1177/0022034514544217

DO - 10.1177/0022034514544217

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25048250

VL - 93

SP - 943

EP - 949

JO - Journal of Dental Research

JF - Journal of Dental Research

SN - 0022-0345

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 113004128