Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Standard

Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems. / Hansen, Dorte Gilså; Munck, Anders P; Kragstrup, Jakob.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol. 20, No. 2, 06.2002, p. 71-3.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hansen, DG, Munck, AP & Kragstrup, J 2002, 'Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems', Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 71-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430215558

APA

Hansen, D. G., Munck, A. P., & Kragstrup, J. (2002). Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 20(2), 71-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430215558

Vancouver

Hansen DG, Munck AP, Kragstrup J. Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2002 Jun;20(2):71-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430215558

Author

Hansen, Dorte Gilså ; Munck, Anders P ; Kragstrup, Jakob. / Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems. In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2002 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 71-3.

Bibtex

@article{07453433ddd44a00a9e75357db1adbc4,
title = "Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems",
abstract = "In 1998, an audit on psychiatric problems in general practice was conducted in four Nordic countries. Five-hundred-and-sixty general practitioners participated and made registration according to the Audit Project Odense method. This paper describes the methodological problems related to international differences in the organisation of health care, recruitment of general practitioners and the registration of contacts. Nordic differences in this audit gave rise to inspiring discussions at national meetings, but methodological problems remain to be resolved if the results are to prove useful in scientific reporting.",
keywords = "Family Practice/standards, Humans, Medical Audit, Mental Disorders/therapy, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Scandinavian and Nordic Countries",
author = "Hansen, {Dorte Gils{\aa}} and Munck, {Anders P} and Jakob Kragstrup",
year = "2002",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1080/02813430215558",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "71--3",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care",
issn = "0281-3432",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological problems in comparing audits from the Nordic countries. A critical review of results from audit on Nordic general practitioners' management of patients with psychiatric problems

AU - Hansen, Dorte Gilså

AU - Munck, Anders P

AU - Kragstrup, Jakob

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - In 1998, an audit on psychiatric problems in general practice was conducted in four Nordic countries. Five-hundred-and-sixty general practitioners participated and made registration according to the Audit Project Odense method. This paper describes the methodological problems related to international differences in the organisation of health care, recruitment of general practitioners and the registration of contacts. Nordic differences in this audit gave rise to inspiring discussions at national meetings, but methodological problems remain to be resolved if the results are to prove useful in scientific reporting.

AB - In 1998, an audit on psychiatric problems in general practice was conducted in four Nordic countries. Five-hundred-and-sixty general practitioners participated and made registration according to the Audit Project Odense method. This paper describes the methodological problems related to international differences in the organisation of health care, recruitment of general practitioners and the registration of contacts. Nordic differences in this audit gave rise to inspiring discussions at national meetings, but methodological problems remain to be resolved if the results are to prove useful in scientific reporting.

KW - Family Practice/standards

KW - Humans

KW - Medical Audit

KW - Mental Disorders/therapy

KW - Practice Patterns, Physicians'

KW - Scandinavian and Nordic Countries

U2 - 10.1080/02813430215558

DO - 10.1080/02813430215558

M3 - Review

C2 - 12184715

VL - 20

SP - 71

EP - 73

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

SN - 0281-3432

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 324178280