Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial. / Jarbol, Dorte Ejg; Kragstrup, Jakob; Stovring, Henrik; Havelund, Troels; Schaffalitzky De Muckadell, Ove B.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 101, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 1200-1208.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Jarbol, DE, Kragstrup, J, Stovring, H, Havelund, T & Schaffalitzky De Muckadell, OB 2006, 'Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial', American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg2006227

APA

Jarbol, D. E., Kragstrup, J., Stovring, H., Havelund, T., & Schaffalitzky De Muckadell, O. B. (2006). Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 101(6), 1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg2006227

Vancouver

Jarbol DE, Kragstrup J, Stovring H, Havelund T, Schaffalitzky De Muckadell OB. Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006 Jun;101(6):1200-1208. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg2006227

Author

Jarbol, Dorte Ejg ; Kragstrup, Jakob ; Stovring, Henrik ; Havelund, Troels ; Schaffalitzky De Muckadell, Ove B. / Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial. In: American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006 ; Vol. 101, No. 6. pp. 1200-1208.

Bibtex

@article{35bf3efdcde5476995030736d2811e3b,
title = "Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The optimal approach for management of patients with dyspepsia has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three strategies for management of dyspepsia: empirical antisecretory therapy, testing for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), or a combination of the two. METHODS: Cluster-randomized trial in general practices. Initial treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was performed in 222 patients, H. pylori test-and-eradicate in 250 patients, and PPI followed by H. pylori-testing if symptoms improved in 250 patients. Symptoms, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and use of resources were recorded during a 1-yr follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 24%. We found no difference among the three strategies (p = 0.16) in terms of the proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms. After 1 yr gastrointestinal symptom scores and quality-of-life scores had improved significantly and equally in the three groups (p < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences were found among the groups. The mean use of endoscopies per patient after 1 yr was higher in the PPI group (0.36 [95% CI 0.30-0.43]) than in the test-and-eradicate group (0.28 [95% CI 0.23-0.34]) and the combination group (0.22 [95% CI 0.17-0.27]), p = 0.02. H. pylori-positive patients given eradication therapy had more days without dyspeptic symptoms (p < 0.001), used less antisecretory therapy (p < 0.01), and were more satisfied (p < 0.001) than H. pylori-negative patients. CONCLUSION: The strategies based on H. pylori test enjoyed similar symptom resolution, but reduced endoscopic workload and lower 1-yr total costs compared with empirical antisecretory therapy.",
author = "Jarbol, {Dorte Ejg} and Jakob Kragstrup and Henrik Stovring and Troels Havelund and {Schaffalitzky De Muckadell}, {Ove B.}",
year = "2006",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1038/ajg2006227",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "1200--1208",
journal = "The American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "nature publishing group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proton pump inhibitor or testing for Helicobacter pylori as the first step for patients presenting with dyspepsia? A cluster-randomized trial

AU - Jarbol, Dorte Ejg

AU - Kragstrup, Jakob

AU - Stovring, Henrik

AU - Havelund, Troels

AU - Schaffalitzky De Muckadell, Ove B.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The optimal approach for management of patients with dyspepsia has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three strategies for management of dyspepsia: empirical antisecretory therapy, testing for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), or a combination of the two. METHODS: Cluster-randomized trial in general practices. Initial treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was performed in 222 patients, H. pylori test-and-eradicate in 250 patients, and PPI followed by H. pylori-testing if symptoms improved in 250 patients. Symptoms, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and use of resources were recorded during a 1-yr follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 24%. We found no difference among the three strategies (p = 0.16) in terms of the proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms. After 1 yr gastrointestinal symptom scores and quality-of-life scores had improved significantly and equally in the three groups (p < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences were found among the groups. The mean use of endoscopies per patient after 1 yr was higher in the PPI group (0.36 [95% CI 0.30-0.43]) than in the test-and-eradicate group (0.28 [95% CI 0.23-0.34]) and the combination group (0.22 [95% CI 0.17-0.27]), p = 0.02. H. pylori-positive patients given eradication therapy had more days without dyspeptic symptoms (p < 0.001), used less antisecretory therapy (p < 0.01), and were more satisfied (p < 0.001) than H. pylori-negative patients. CONCLUSION: The strategies based on H. pylori test enjoyed similar symptom resolution, but reduced endoscopic workload and lower 1-yr total costs compared with empirical antisecretory therapy.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The optimal approach for management of patients with dyspepsia has not been determined. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three strategies for management of dyspepsia: empirical antisecretory therapy, testing for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), or a combination of the two. METHODS: Cluster-randomized trial in general practices. Initial treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was performed in 222 patients, H. pylori test-and-eradicate in 250 patients, and PPI followed by H. pylori-testing if symptoms improved in 250 patients. Symptoms, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and use of resources were recorded during a 1-yr follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 24%. We found no difference among the three strategies (p = 0.16) in terms of the proportion of days without dyspeptic symptoms. After 1 yr gastrointestinal symptom scores and quality-of-life scores had improved significantly and equally in the three groups (p < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences were found among the groups. The mean use of endoscopies per patient after 1 yr was higher in the PPI group (0.36 [95% CI 0.30-0.43]) than in the test-and-eradicate group (0.28 [95% CI 0.23-0.34]) and the combination group (0.22 [95% CI 0.17-0.27]), p = 0.02. H. pylori-positive patients given eradication therapy had more days without dyspeptic symptoms (p < 0.001), used less antisecretory therapy (p < 0.01), and were more satisfied (p < 0.001) than H. pylori-negative patients. CONCLUSION: The strategies based on H. pylori test enjoyed similar symptom resolution, but reduced endoscopic workload and lower 1-yr total costs compared with empirical antisecretory therapy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744802674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ajg2006227

DO - 10.1038/ajg2006227

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16771937

AN - SCOPUS:33744802674

VL - 101

SP - 1200

EP - 1208

JO - The American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - The American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 324142229