Regionalization Lessons from Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearch

Standard

Regionalization Lessons from Denmark. / Vrangbæk, Karsten.

In: HealthcarePapers, Vol. 16, No. 1, 07.2016, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearch

Harvard

Vrangbæk, K 2016, 'Regionalization Lessons from Denmark', HealthcarePapers, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21-26. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2016.24769

APA

Vrangbæk, K. (2016). Regionalization Lessons from Denmark. HealthcarePapers, 16(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2016.24769

Vancouver

Vrangbæk K. Regionalization Lessons from Denmark. HealthcarePapers. 2016 Jul;16(1):21-26. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2016.24769

Author

Vrangbæk, Karsten. / Regionalization Lessons from Denmark. In: HealthcarePapers. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 21-26.

Bibtex

@article{ed851709212748739a5c12a8bee2c361,
title = "Regionalization Lessons from Denmark",
abstract = "Denmark is a small Northern European country with an extensive welfare state and a strong commitment to maintaining a universal healthcare system. Like the other countries in the Nordic region, Denmark has a long tradition of democratically governed local and regional governments with extensive responsibilities in organizing welfare state services. The Danish healthcare system has demonstrated an ability to increase productivity, while at the same time maintaining a high level of patient satisfaction. Ongoing reforms have contributed to these results, as well as a firm commitment to innovation and coordination. Regions and municipalities in Denmark are governed by directly elected democratic councils. The Danish case is thus an example of democratic decentralization, but within a framework of national coordination and fiscal control. In spite of the difference in size and historical traditions there are also many similarities between Canada and Denmark, particularly in terms of health and social policy goals and aspirations, and in terms of the commitment to a comprehensive, universal healthcare system. These similarities provide interesting opportunities for comparison.",
author = "Karsten Vrangb{\ae}k",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
doi = "10.12927/hcpap.2016.24769",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "HealthcarePapers",
issn = "1488-917X",
publisher = "Longwoods Publishing Corp.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regionalization Lessons from Denmark

AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - Denmark is a small Northern European country with an extensive welfare state and a strong commitment to maintaining a universal healthcare system. Like the other countries in the Nordic region, Denmark has a long tradition of democratically governed local and regional governments with extensive responsibilities in organizing welfare state services. The Danish healthcare system has demonstrated an ability to increase productivity, while at the same time maintaining a high level of patient satisfaction. Ongoing reforms have contributed to these results, as well as a firm commitment to innovation and coordination. Regions and municipalities in Denmark are governed by directly elected democratic councils. The Danish case is thus an example of democratic decentralization, but within a framework of national coordination and fiscal control. In spite of the difference in size and historical traditions there are also many similarities between Canada and Denmark, particularly in terms of health and social policy goals and aspirations, and in terms of the commitment to a comprehensive, universal healthcare system. These similarities provide interesting opportunities for comparison.

AB - Denmark is a small Northern European country with an extensive welfare state and a strong commitment to maintaining a universal healthcare system. Like the other countries in the Nordic region, Denmark has a long tradition of democratically governed local and regional governments with extensive responsibilities in organizing welfare state services. The Danish healthcare system has demonstrated an ability to increase productivity, while at the same time maintaining a high level of patient satisfaction. Ongoing reforms have contributed to these results, as well as a firm commitment to innovation and coordination. Regions and municipalities in Denmark are governed by directly elected democratic councils. The Danish case is thus an example of democratic decentralization, but within a framework of national coordination and fiscal control. In spite of the difference in size and historical traditions there are also many similarities between Canada and Denmark, particularly in terms of health and social policy goals and aspirations, and in terms of the commitment to a comprehensive, universal healthcare system. These similarities provide interesting opportunities for comparison.

U2 - 10.12927/hcpap.2016.24769

DO - 10.12927/hcpap.2016.24769

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 16

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - HealthcarePapers

JF - HealthcarePapers

SN - 1488-917X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 168055367