Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data: Examples From Studies of Microchimerism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data : Examples From Studies of Microchimerism. / Guthrie, Katherine A.; Gammill, Hilary S.; Kamper-Jørgensen, Mads; Tjønneland, Anne; Gadi, Vijayakrishna K.; Nelson, J. Lee; Leisenring, Wendy.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 184, No. 10, 15.11.2016, p. 779-786.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Guthrie, KA, Gammill, HS, Kamper-Jørgensen, M, Tjønneland, A, Gadi, VK, Nelson, JL & Leisenring, W 2016, 'Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data: Examples From Studies of Microchimerism', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 184, no. 10, pp. 779-786. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww093

APA

Guthrie, K. A., Gammill, H. S., Kamper-Jørgensen, M., Tjønneland, A., Gadi, V. K., Nelson, J. L., & Leisenring, W. (2016). Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data: Examples From Studies of Microchimerism. American Journal of Epidemiology, 184(10), 779-786. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww093

Vancouver

Guthrie KA, Gammill HS, Kamper-Jørgensen M, Tjønneland A, Gadi VK, Nelson JL et al. Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data: Examples From Studies of Microchimerism. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2016 Nov 15;184(10):779-786. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww093

Author

Guthrie, Katherine A. ; Gammill, Hilary S. ; Kamper-Jørgensen, Mads ; Tjønneland, Anne ; Gadi, Vijayakrishna K. ; Nelson, J. Lee ; Leisenring, Wendy. / Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data : Examples From Studies of Microchimerism. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2016 ; Vol. 184, No. 10. pp. 779-786.

Bibtex

@article{b4c66f3c325745d5b16cd5299026bf58,
title = "Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data: Examples From Studies of Microchimerism",
abstract = "Natural acquisition of small amounts of foreign cells or DNA, referred to as microchimerism, occurs primarily through maternal-fetal exchange during pregnancy. Microchimerism can persist long-term and has been associated with both beneficial and adverse human health outcomes. Quantitative microchimerism data present challenges for statistical analysis, including a skewed distribution, excess zero values, and occasional large values. Methods for comparing microchimerism levels across groups while controlling for covariates are not well established. We compared statistical models for quantitative microchimerism values, applied to simulated data sets and 2 observed data sets, to make recommendations for analytic practice. Modeling the level of quantitative microchimerism as a rate via Poisson or negative binomial model with the rate of detection defined as a count of microchimerism genome equivalents per total cell equivalents tested utilizes all available data and facilitates a comparison of rates between groups. We found that both the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model and the negative binomial model can provide unbiased and consistent estimates of the overall association of exposure or study group with microchimerism detection rates. The negative binomial model remains the more accessible of these 2 approaches; thus, we conclude that the negative binomial model may be most appropriate for analyzing quantitative microchimerism data.",
author = "Guthrie, {Katherine A.} and Gammill, {Hilary S.} and Mads Kamper-J{\o}rgensen and Anne Tj{\o}nneland and Gadi, {Vijayakrishna K.} and Nelson, {J. Lee} and Wendy Leisenring",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kww093",
language = "English",
volume = "184",
pages = "779--786",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data

T2 - Examples From Studies of Microchimerism

AU - Guthrie, Katherine A.

AU - Gammill, Hilary S.

AU - Kamper-Jørgensen, Mads

AU - Tjønneland, Anne

AU - Gadi, Vijayakrishna K.

AU - Nelson, J. Lee

AU - Leisenring, Wendy

N1 - © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2016/11/15

Y1 - 2016/11/15

N2 - Natural acquisition of small amounts of foreign cells or DNA, referred to as microchimerism, occurs primarily through maternal-fetal exchange during pregnancy. Microchimerism can persist long-term and has been associated with both beneficial and adverse human health outcomes. Quantitative microchimerism data present challenges for statistical analysis, including a skewed distribution, excess zero values, and occasional large values. Methods for comparing microchimerism levels across groups while controlling for covariates are not well established. We compared statistical models for quantitative microchimerism values, applied to simulated data sets and 2 observed data sets, to make recommendations for analytic practice. Modeling the level of quantitative microchimerism as a rate via Poisson or negative binomial model with the rate of detection defined as a count of microchimerism genome equivalents per total cell equivalents tested utilizes all available data and facilitates a comparison of rates between groups. We found that both the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model and the negative binomial model can provide unbiased and consistent estimates of the overall association of exposure or study group with microchimerism detection rates. The negative binomial model remains the more accessible of these 2 approaches; thus, we conclude that the negative binomial model may be most appropriate for analyzing quantitative microchimerism data.

AB - Natural acquisition of small amounts of foreign cells or DNA, referred to as microchimerism, occurs primarily through maternal-fetal exchange during pregnancy. Microchimerism can persist long-term and has been associated with both beneficial and adverse human health outcomes. Quantitative microchimerism data present challenges for statistical analysis, including a skewed distribution, excess zero values, and occasional large values. Methods for comparing microchimerism levels across groups while controlling for covariates are not well established. We compared statistical models for quantitative microchimerism values, applied to simulated data sets and 2 observed data sets, to make recommendations for analytic practice. Modeling the level of quantitative microchimerism as a rate via Poisson or negative binomial model with the rate of detection defined as a count of microchimerism genome equivalents per total cell equivalents tested utilizes all available data and facilitates a comparison of rates between groups. We found that both the marginalized zero-inflated Poisson model and the negative binomial model can provide unbiased and consistent estimates of the overall association of exposure or study group with microchimerism detection rates. The negative binomial model remains the more accessible of these 2 approaches; thus, we conclude that the negative binomial model may be most appropriate for analyzing quantitative microchimerism data.

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kww093

DO - 10.1093/aje/kww093

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27769989

VL - 184

SP - 779

EP - 786

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 169168738