The use of polygenic risk scores as a covariate in psychological studies
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The use of polygenic risk scores as a covariate in psychological studies. / Uddin, Md Jamal; Hjorthøj, Carsten; Ahammed, Tanvir; Nordentoft, Merete; Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn.
In: Methods in Psychology, Vol. 7, 100099, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of polygenic risk scores as a covariate in psychological studies
AU - Uddin, Md Jamal
AU - Hjorthøj, Carsten
AU - Ahammed, Tanvir
AU - Nordentoft, Merete
AU - Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are increasingly used to predict diseases (e.g., schizophrenia). However, the proper application of the PRS in psychological studies is sparse. We aimed to evaluate the methodological aspects of using PRS as a covariate in causal association studies in psychology. We conducted a simulation study using realistic scenarios, such as gene and exposure or confounder interaction, gene and gene interaction, gene acts as confounding and instrumental variable and replicated each scenario 1000 times. We found that when the genotype(s) that was used for calculating PRS interacted with the exposure and if the analyses considering this interaction, the exposure effect similar with the true value. However, a significant amount of bias was present even after adjustment for the measured confounders i) when the gene interacted with the unmeasured confounder and this bias amplified when the interaction effect was two times stronger; and ii) when the gene acts as a confounder or instrumental variable. Therefore, theoretical knowledge of psychology should be incorporated when the PRS is utilized in psychological causal association studies in order to reduce systematic bias and improve the precision of the exposure effect.
AB - Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are increasingly used to predict diseases (e.g., schizophrenia). However, the proper application of the PRS in psychological studies is sparse. We aimed to evaluate the methodological aspects of using PRS as a covariate in causal association studies in psychology. We conducted a simulation study using realistic scenarios, such as gene and exposure or confounder interaction, gene and gene interaction, gene acts as confounding and instrumental variable and replicated each scenario 1000 times. We found that when the genotype(s) that was used for calculating PRS interacted with the exposure and if the analyses considering this interaction, the exposure effect similar with the true value. However, a significant amount of bias was present even after adjustment for the measured confounders i) when the gene interacted with the unmeasured confounder and this bias amplified when the interaction effect was two times stronger; and ii) when the gene acts as a confounder or instrumental variable. Therefore, theoretical knowledge of psychology should be incorporated when the PRS is utilized in psychological causal association studies in order to reduce systematic bias and improve the precision of the exposure effect.
KW - Bias
KW - Causal association
KW - Covariate
KW - Genetic risk scores/polygenic risk scores
KW - Simulation
U2 - 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100099
DO - 10.1016/j.metip.2022.100099
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85134350691
VL - 7
JO - Methods in Psychology
JF - Methods in Psychology
SN - 2590-2601
M1 - 100099
ER -
ID: 321876654