Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. / Studsgaard, Anne; Skorstengaard, Malene; Glavind, Julie; Hvidman, Lone; Uldbjerg, Niels.

In: Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica, Vol. 92, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1256-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Studsgaard, A, Skorstengaard, M, Glavind, J, Hvidman, L & Uldbjerg, N 2013, 'Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery', Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 1256-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12240

APA

Studsgaard, A., Skorstengaard, M., Glavind, J., Hvidman, L., & Uldbjerg, N. (2013). Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica, 92(11), 1256-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12240

Vancouver

Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica. 2013 Nov;92(11):1256-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12240

Author

Studsgaard, Anne ; Skorstengaard, Malene ; Glavind, Julie ; Hvidman, Lone ; Uldbjerg, Niels. / Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. In: Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica. 2013 ; Vol. 92, No. 11. pp. 1256-63.

Bibtex

@article{af92cdf18b184a53b85876a4af28bd2d,
title = "Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean delivery on maternal request (ERCD-MR).DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.SETTING: Danish university hospital.POPULATION: Women with TOLAC (n = 1161) and women with ERCD-MR (n = 622) between 2003 and 2010. Exclusion criteria were diabetes, two prior cesarean sections, index cesarean at a different hospital, a delivery after the index cesarean, twin gestation, gestational age <37(+0) weeks and stillbirth.METHODS: Data were obtained from the Aarhus Birth Cohort database, which comprised prospective registration of the deliveries.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse neonatal outcomes, risk factors for emergency cesarean, and uterine rupture in case of TOLAC.RESULTS: TOLAC was associated with an increased risk of neonatal depression [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-19.1] and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8). Within the TOLAC group 67% delivered vaginally. In the TOLAC group 1.3% (n = 15) of the women had a complete uterine rupture. None of these infants had sequelae after 12 months. Significant risk factors for emergency cesarean were no prior vaginal delivery (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), index emergency cesarean during labor (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.1), maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8), pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥30 (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), and birthweight 4000-4499 g (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Uterine rupture was associated with the use of epidural analgesia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.9) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = 0.03).CONCLUSION: TOLAC is an acceptable individualized option for women without major risk factors.",
keywords = "Adult, Cesarean Section, Repeat, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Logistic Models, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Trial of Labor, Uterine Rupture, Vaginal Birth after Cesarean",
author = "Anne Studsgaard and Malene Skorstengaard and Julie Glavind and Lone Hvidman and Niels Uldbjerg",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.",
year = "2013",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/aogs.12240",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "1256--63",
journal = "Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-6349",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery

AU - Studsgaard, Anne

AU - Skorstengaard, Malene

AU - Glavind, Julie

AU - Hvidman, Lone

AU - Uldbjerg, Niels

N1 - © 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean delivery on maternal request (ERCD-MR).DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.SETTING: Danish university hospital.POPULATION: Women with TOLAC (n = 1161) and women with ERCD-MR (n = 622) between 2003 and 2010. Exclusion criteria were diabetes, two prior cesarean sections, index cesarean at a different hospital, a delivery after the index cesarean, twin gestation, gestational age <37(+0) weeks and stillbirth.METHODS: Data were obtained from the Aarhus Birth Cohort database, which comprised prospective registration of the deliveries.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse neonatal outcomes, risk factors for emergency cesarean, and uterine rupture in case of TOLAC.RESULTS: TOLAC was associated with an increased risk of neonatal depression [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-19.1] and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8). Within the TOLAC group 67% delivered vaginally. In the TOLAC group 1.3% (n = 15) of the women had a complete uterine rupture. None of these infants had sequelae after 12 months. Significant risk factors for emergency cesarean were no prior vaginal delivery (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), index emergency cesarean during labor (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.1), maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8), pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥30 (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), and birthweight 4000-4499 g (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Uterine rupture was associated with the use of epidural analgesia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.9) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = 0.03).CONCLUSION: TOLAC is an acceptable individualized option for women without major risk factors.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean delivery on maternal request (ERCD-MR).DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.SETTING: Danish university hospital.POPULATION: Women with TOLAC (n = 1161) and women with ERCD-MR (n = 622) between 2003 and 2010. Exclusion criteria were diabetes, two prior cesarean sections, index cesarean at a different hospital, a delivery after the index cesarean, twin gestation, gestational age <37(+0) weeks and stillbirth.METHODS: Data were obtained from the Aarhus Birth Cohort database, which comprised prospective registration of the deliveries.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse neonatal outcomes, risk factors for emergency cesarean, and uterine rupture in case of TOLAC.RESULTS: TOLAC was associated with an increased risk of neonatal depression [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-19.1] and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8). Within the TOLAC group 67% delivered vaginally. In the TOLAC group 1.3% (n = 15) of the women had a complete uterine rupture. None of these infants had sequelae after 12 months. Significant risk factors for emergency cesarean were no prior vaginal delivery (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), index emergency cesarean during labor (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.1), maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8), pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥30 (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), and birthweight 4000-4499 g (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Uterine rupture was associated with the use of epidural analgesia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.9) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = 0.03).CONCLUSION: TOLAC is an acceptable individualized option for women without major risk factors.

KW - Adult

KW - Cesarean Section, Repeat

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Logistic Models

KW - Pregnancy

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Trial of Labor

KW - Uterine Rupture

KW - Vaginal Birth after Cesarean

U2 - 10.1111/aogs.12240

DO - 10.1111/aogs.12240

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23962339

VL - 92

SP - 1256

EP - 1263

JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-6349

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 153101632