A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD. / Turrini, Giulia; Tedeschi, Federico; Cuijpers, Pim; Del Giovane, Cinzia; Kip, Ahlke; Morina, Nexhmedin; Nosè, Michela; Ostuzzi, Giovanni; Purgato, Marianna; Ricciardi, Chiara; Sijbrandij, Marit; Tol, Wietse; Barbui, Corrado.

In: BMJ Global Health, Vol. 6, No. 6, e005029, 2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Turrini, G, Tedeschi, F, Cuijpers, P, Del Giovane, C, Kip, A, Morina, N, Nosè, M, Ostuzzi, G, Purgato, M, Ricciardi, C, Sijbrandij, M, Tol, W & Barbui, C 2021, 'A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD', BMJ Global Health, vol. 6, no. 6, e005029. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005029

APA

Turrini, G., Tedeschi, F., Cuijpers, P., Del Giovane, C., Kip, A., Morina, N., Nosè, M., Ostuzzi, G., Purgato, M., Ricciardi, C., Sijbrandij, M., Tol, W., & Barbui, C. (2021). A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD. BMJ Global Health, 6(6), [e005029]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005029

Vancouver

Turrini G, Tedeschi F, Cuijpers P, Del Giovane C, Kip A, Morina N et al. A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(6). e005029. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005029

Author

Turrini, Giulia ; Tedeschi, Federico ; Cuijpers, Pim ; Del Giovane, Cinzia ; Kip, Ahlke ; Morina, Nexhmedin ; Nosè, Michela ; Ostuzzi, Giovanni ; Purgato, Marianna ; Ricciardi, Chiara ; Sijbrandij, Marit ; Tol, Wietse ; Barbui, Corrado. / A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD. In: BMJ Global Health. 2021 ; Vol. 6, No. 6.

Bibtex

@article{cabd442530f34ac8993f977469990437,
title = "A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD",
abstract = "Introduction Refugees and asylum seekers are vulnerable to common mental disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach, the present systematic review compared and ranked psychosocial interventions for the treatment of PTSD in adult refugees and asylum seekers. Methods Randomised studies of psychosocial interventions for adult refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD were systematically identified. PTSD symptoms at postintervention was the primary outcome. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ORs were pooled using pairwise and NMA. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed through the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis application. Results A total of 23 studies with 2308 participants were included. Sixteen studies were conducted in high-income countries, and seven in low-income or middle-income countries. Most studies were at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane RoB tool. NMA on PTSD symptoms showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (SMD=-1.41; 95% CI -2.43 to -0.38) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) (SMD=-1.30; 95% CI -2.40 to -0.20) were significantly more effective than waitlist (WL). CBT was also associated with a higher decrease in PTSD symptoms than treatment as usual (TAU) (SMD -1.51; 95% CI -2.67 to -0.36). For all other interventions, the difference with WL and TAU was not significant. CBT and EMDR ranked best according to the mean surface under the cumulative ranking. Regarding acceptability, no intervention had less dropouts than inactive interventions. Conclusion CBT and EMDR appeared to have the greatest effects in reducing PTSD symptoms in asylum seekers and refugees. This evidence should be considered in guidelines and implementation packages to facilitate dissemination and uptake in refugee settings. ",
keywords = "mental health & psychiatry, public health, traumatology",
author = "Giulia Turrini and Federico Tedeschi and Pim Cuijpers and {Del Giovane}, Cinzia and Ahlke Kip and Nexhmedin Morina and Michela Nos{\`e} and Giovanni Ostuzzi and Marianna Purgato and Chiara Ricciardi and Marit Sijbrandij and Wietse Tol and Corrado Barbui",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005029",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMJ Global Health",
issn = "2059-7908",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A network meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD

AU - Turrini, Giulia

AU - Tedeschi, Federico

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Del Giovane, Cinzia

AU - Kip, Ahlke

AU - Morina, Nexhmedin

AU - Nosè, Michela

AU - Ostuzzi, Giovanni

AU - Purgato, Marianna

AU - Ricciardi, Chiara

AU - Sijbrandij, Marit

AU - Tol, Wietse

AU - Barbui, Corrado

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Introduction Refugees and asylum seekers are vulnerable to common mental disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach, the present systematic review compared and ranked psychosocial interventions for the treatment of PTSD in adult refugees and asylum seekers. Methods Randomised studies of psychosocial interventions for adult refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD were systematically identified. PTSD symptoms at postintervention was the primary outcome. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ORs were pooled using pairwise and NMA. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed through the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis application. Results A total of 23 studies with 2308 participants were included. Sixteen studies were conducted in high-income countries, and seven in low-income or middle-income countries. Most studies were at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane RoB tool. NMA on PTSD symptoms showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (SMD=-1.41; 95% CI -2.43 to -0.38) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) (SMD=-1.30; 95% CI -2.40 to -0.20) were significantly more effective than waitlist (WL). CBT was also associated with a higher decrease in PTSD symptoms than treatment as usual (TAU) (SMD -1.51; 95% CI -2.67 to -0.36). For all other interventions, the difference with WL and TAU was not significant. CBT and EMDR ranked best according to the mean surface under the cumulative ranking. Regarding acceptability, no intervention had less dropouts than inactive interventions. Conclusion CBT and EMDR appeared to have the greatest effects in reducing PTSD symptoms in asylum seekers and refugees. This evidence should be considered in guidelines and implementation packages to facilitate dissemination and uptake in refugee settings.

AB - Introduction Refugees and asylum seekers are vulnerable to common mental disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach, the present systematic review compared and ranked psychosocial interventions for the treatment of PTSD in adult refugees and asylum seekers. Methods Randomised studies of psychosocial interventions for adult refugees and asylum seekers with PTSD were systematically identified. PTSD symptoms at postintervention was the primary outcome. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and ORs were pooled using pairwise and NMA. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, and certainty of evidence was assessed through the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis application. Results A total of 23 studies with 2308 participants were included. Sixteen studies were conducted in high-income countries, and seven in low-income or middle-income countries. Most studies were at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane RoB tool. NMA on PTSD symptoms showed that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) (SMD=-1.41; 95% CI -2.43 to -0.38) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) (SMD=-1.30; 95% CI -2.40 to -0.20) were significantly more effective than waitlist (WL). CBT was also associated with a higher decrease in PTSD symptoms than treatment as usual (TAU) (SMD -1.51; 95% CI -2.67 to -0.36). For all other interventions, the difference with WL and TAU was not significant. CBT and EMDR ranked best according to the mean surface under the cumulative ranking. Regarding acceptability, no intervention had less dropouts than inactive interventions. Conclusion CBT and EMDR appeared to have the greatest effects in reducing PTSD symptoms in asylum seekers and refugees. This evidence should be considered in guidelines and implementation packages to facilitate dissemination and uptake in refugee settings.

KW - mental health & psychiatry

KW - public health

KW - traumatology

U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005029

DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005029

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34088735

AN - SCOPUS:85107930663

VL - 6

JO - BMJ Global Health

JF - BMJ Global Health

SN - 2059-7908

IS - 6

M1 - e005029

ER -

ID: 276331413