The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program. / Quaglio, Gianluca; Guardabasso, Vincenzo; Olesen, Ole F.; Draghia-Akli, Ruxandra.

In: Journal of Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 5, 10.2011, p. 445-452.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Quaglio, G, Guardabasso, V, Olesen, OF & Draghia-Akli, R 2011, 'The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program', Journal of Public Health, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-011-0395-5

APA

Quaglio, G., Guardabasso, V., Olesen, O. F., & Draghia-Akli, R. (2011). The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program. Journal of Public Health, 19(5), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-011-0395-5

Vancouver

Quaglio G, Guardabasso V, Olesen OF, Draghia-Akli R. The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program. Journal of Public Health. 2011 Oct;19(5):445-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-011-0395-5

Author

Quaglio, Gianluca ; Guardabasso, Vincenzo ; Olesen, Ole F. ; Draghia-Akli, Ruxandra. / The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program. In: Journal of Public Health. 2011 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 445-452.

Bibtex

@article{cc5ae9f375b4431192e1ebc9f99ddaa1,
title = "The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program",
abstract = "Aim The Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development (FP) are the European Union's funding programmes for research in Europe. The study analyses the features of external experts involved in evaluating the research proposals in FP6 (years 2003- 2006) in the area of Life Sciences. Subjects and methods Experts were analysed with respect to nationality, gender, organisational affiliation and rotation. The correlations between the number of experts by nationality and scientific research indicators were also explored. Result Experts from 70 countries participated, with 70% coming from 10 countries. The gender composition was relatively stable, with approximately 30% of female experts. The majority of experts came from higher education establishments (51%) and 12% from industry. About 40% of experts participated in the evaluation process two or more times. The number of experts by nationality was linearly correlated with gross national income (r=0.95, p",
keywords = "European commission, Evaluators, Framework programs, Health research, Peer review",
author = "Gianluca Quaglio and Vincenzo Guardabasso and Olesen, {Ole F.} and Ruxandra Draghia-Akli",
year = "2011",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s10389-011-0395-5",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "445--452",
journal = "Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice",
issn = "2198-1833",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The selection of experts evaluating health projects for the EU Sixth Framework Program

AU - Quaglio, Gianluca

AU - Guardabasso, Vincenzo

AU - Olesen, Ole F.

AU - Draghia-Akli, Ruxandra

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Aim The Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development (FP) are the European Union's funding programmes for research in Europe. The study analyses the features of external experts involved in evaluating the research proposals in FP6 (years 2003- 2006) in the area of Life Sciences. Subjects and methods Experts were analysed with respect to nationality, gender, organisational affiliation and rotation. The correlations between the number of experts by nationality and scientific research indicators were also explored. Result Experts from 70 countries participated, with 70% coming from 10 countries. The gender composition was relatively stable, with approximately 30% of female experts. The majority of experts came from higher education establishments (51%) and 12% from industry. About 40% of experts participated in the evaluation process two or more times. The number of experts by nationality was linearly correlated with gross national income (r=0.95, p

AB - Aim The Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development (FP) are the European Union's funding programmes for research in Europe. The study analyses the features of external experts involved in evaluating the research proposals in FP6 (years 2003- 2006) in the area of Life Sciences. Subjects and methods Experts were analysed with respect to nationality, gender, organisational affiliation and rotation. The correlations between the number of experts by nationality and scientific research indicators were also explored. Result Experts from 70 countries participated, with 70% coming from 10 countries. The gender composition was relatively stable, with approximately 30% of female experts. The majority of experts came from higher education establishments (51%) and 12% from industry. About 40% of experts participated in the evaluation process two or more times. The number of experts by nationality was linearly correlated with gross national income (r=0.95, p

KW - European commission

KW - Evaluators

KW - Framework programs

KW - Health research

KW - Peer review

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/388ad7c4-0326-31e6-97b7-15fc06999abc/

U2 - 10.1007/s10389-011-0395-5

DO - 10.1007/s10389-011-0395-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 445

EP - 452

JO - Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice

SN - 2198-1833

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 252045384