A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve. / Blanche, Paul; Dartigues, Jean-Francois; Riou, Jeremie.

In: Biometrics, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2022, p. 352-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Blanche, P, Dartigues, J-F & Riou, J 2022, 'A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve', Biometrics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 352-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13401

APA

Blanche, P., Dartigues, J-F., & Riou, J. (2022). A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve. Biometrics, 78(1), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13401

Vancouver

Blanche P, Dartigues J-F, Riou J. A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve. Biometrics. 2022;78(1):352-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13401

Author

Blanche, Paul ; Dartigues, Jean-Francois ; Riou, Jeremie. / A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve. In: Biometrics. 2022 ; Vol. 78, No. 1. pp. 352-363.

Bibtex

@article{2fec9530abf840b2bd597ef0f53a7dea,
title = "A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve",
abstract = "Comparing areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) is a popular approach to compare prognostic biomarkers. The aim of this paper is to present an efficient method to control the family-wise error rate when multiple comparisons are performed. We suggest to combine the max-t test and the closed testing procedures. We build on previous work on asymptotic results for ROC curves and on general multiple testing methods to efficiently take into account both the correlations between the test statistics and the logical constraints between the null hypotheses. The proposed method results in an uniformly more powerful procedure than both the single-step max-t test procedure and popular stepwise extensions of the Bonferroni procedure, such as Bonferroni-Holm. As demonstrated in this paper, the method can be applied in most usual contexts, including the time-dependent context with right censored data. We show how the method works in practice through a motivating example where we compare several psychometric scores to predict the t-year risk of Alzheimer's disease. The example illustrates several multiple testing settings and demonstrates the advantage of using the proposed methods over common alternatives. R code has been made available to facilitate the use of the methods by others.",
keywords = "biomarker, closed testing, max&#8208, t test, multiple testing, ROC curve, survival analysis, OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES, GENERAL CONTRASTS",
author = "Paul Blanche and Jean-Francois Dartigues and Jeremie Riou",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/biom.13401",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "352--363",
journal = "Biometrics",
issn = "0006-341X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve

AU - Blanche, Paul

AU - Dartigues, Jean-Francois

AU - Riou, Jeremie

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Comparing areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) is a popular approach to compare prognostic biomarkers. The aim of this paper is to present an efficient method to control the family-wise error rate when multiple comparisons are performed. We suggest to combine the max-t test and the closed testing procedures. We build on previous work on asymptotic results for ROC curves and on general multiple testing methods to efficiently take into account both the correlations between the test statistics and the logical constraints between the null hypotheses. The proposed method results in an uniformly more powerful procedure than both the single-step max-t test procedure and popular stepwise extensions of the Bonferroni procedure, such as Bonferroni-Holm. As demonstrated in this paper, the method can be applied in most usual contexts, including the time-dependent context with right censored data. We show how the method works in practice through a motivating example where we compare several psychometric scores to predict the t-year risk of Alzheimer's disease. The example illustrates several multiple testing settings and demonstrates the advantage of using the proposed methods over common alternatives. R code has been made available to facilitate the use of the methods by others.

AB - Comparing areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) is a popular approach to compare prognostic biomarkers. The aim of this paper is to present an efficient method to control the family-wise error rate when multiple comparisons are performed. We suggest to combine the max-t test and the closed testing procedures. We build on previous work on asymptotic results for ROC curves and on general multiple testing methods to efficiently take into account both the correlations between the test statistics and the logical constraints between the null hypotheses. The proposed method results in an uniformly more powerful procedure than both the single-step max-t test procedure and popular stepwise extensions of the Bonferroni procedure, such as Bonferroni-Holm. As demonstrated in this paper, the method can be applied in most usual contexts, including the time-dependent context with right censored data. We show how the method works in practice through a motivating example where we compare several psychometric scores to predict the t-year risk of Alzheimer's disease. The example illustrates several multiple testing settings and demonstrates the advantage of using the proposed methods over common alternatives. R code has been made available to facilitate the use of the methods by others.

KW - biomarker

KW - closed testing

KW - max&#8208

KW - t test

KW - multiple testing

KW - ROC curve

KW - survival analysis

KW - OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES

KW - GENERAL CONTRASTS

U2 - 10.1111/biom.13401

DO - 10.1111/biom.13401

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33207001

VL - 78

SP - 352

EP - 363

JO - Biometrics

JF - Biometrics

SN - 0006-341X

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 253443962