An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions. / Fournier, Marie-Cécile; Dantan, Etienne; Blanche, Paul Frédéric.

In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 7, 30.03.2018, p. 1125-1133.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Fournier, M-C, Dantan, E & Blanche, PF 2018, 'An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1125-1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7571

APA

Fournier, M-C., Dantan, E., & Blanche, P. F. (2018). An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions. Statistics in Medicine, 37(7), 1125-1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7571

Vancouver

Fournier M-C, Dantan E, Blanche PF. An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions. Statistics in Medicine. 2018 Mar 30;37(7):1125-1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7571

Author

Fournier, Marie-Cécile ; Dantan, Etienne ; Blanche, Paul Frédéric. / An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions. In: Statistics in Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 1125-1133.

Bibtex

@article{36d73412a711488387696fb46eabe62d,
title = "An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions",
abstract = "In the context of chronic diseases, patient's health evolution is often evaluated through the study of longitudinal markers and major clinical events such as relapses or death. Dynamic predictions of such types of events may be useful to improve patients management all along their follow-up. Dynamic predictions consist of predictions that are based on information repeatedly collected over time, such as measurements of a biomarker, and that can be updated as soon as new information becomes available. Several techniques to derive dynamic predictions have already been suggested, and computation of dynamic predictions is becoming increasingly popular. In this work, we focus on assessing predictive accuracy of dynamic predictions and suggest that using an R2 -curve may help. It facilitates the evaluation of the predictive accuracy gain obtained when accumulating information on a patient's health profile over time. A nonparametric inverse probability of censoring weighted estimator is suggested to deal with censoring. Large sample results are provided, and methods to compute confidence intervals and bands are derived. A simulation study assesses the finite sample size behavior of the inference procedures and illustrates the shape of some R2 -curves which can be expected in common settings. A detailed application to kidney transplant data is also presented.",
author = "Marie-C{\'e}cile Fournier and Etienne Dantan and Blanche, {Paul Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/sim.7571",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1125--1133",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An R -curve for evaluating the accuracy of dynamic predictions

AU - Fournier, Marie-Cécile

AU - Dantan, Etienne

AU - Blanche, Paul Frédéric

N1 - Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2018/3/30

Y1 - 2018/3/30

N2 - In the context of chronic diseases, patient's health evolution is often evaluated through the study of longitudinal markers and major clinical events such as relapses or death. Dynamic predictions of such types of events may be useful to improve patients management all along their follow-up. Dynamic predictions consist of predictions that are based on information repeatedly collected over time, such as measurements of a biomarker, and that can be updated as soon as new information becomes available. Several techniques to derive dynamic predictions have already been suggested, and computation of dynamic predictions is becoming increasingly popular. In this work, we focus on assessing predictive accuracy of dynamic predictions and suggest that using an R2 -curve may help. It facilitates the evaluation of the predictive accuracy gain obtained when accumulating information on a patient's health profile over time. A nonparametric inverse probability of censoring weighted estimator is suggested to deal with censoring. Large sample results are provided, and methods to compute confidence intervals and bands are derived. A simulation study assesses the finite sample size behavior of the inference procedures and illustrates the shape of some R2 -curves which can be expected in common settings. A detailed application to kidney transplant data is also presented.

AB - In the context of chronic diseases, patient's health evolution is often evaluated through the study of longitudinal markers and major clinical events such as relapses or death. Dynamic predictions of such types of events may be useful to improve patients management all along their follow-up. Dynamic predictions consist of predictions that are based on information repeatedly collected over time, such as measurements of a biomarker, and that can be updated as soon as new information becomes available. Several techniques to derive dynamic predictions have already been suggested, and computation of dynamic predictions is becoming increasingly popular. In this work, we focus on assessing predictive accuracy of dynamic predictions and suggest that using an R2 -curve may help. It facilitates the evaluation of the predictive accuracy gain obtained when accumulating information on a patient's health profile over time. A nonparametric inverse probability of censoring weighted estimator is suggested to deal with censoring. Large sample results are provided, and methods to compute confidence intervals and bands are derived. A simulation study assesses the finite sample size behavior of the inference procedures and illustrates the shape of some R2 -curves which can be expected in common settings. A detailed application to kidney transplant data is also presented.

U2 - 10.1002/sim.7571

DO - 10.1002/sim.7571

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29205452

VL - 37

SP - 1125

EP - 1133

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 197466318