Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study. / Nielsen, Karina; Randall, Raymond; Christensen, Karl B.

In: Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.04.2017, p. 223-247.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, K, Randall, R & Christensen, KB 2017, 'Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study', Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815589050

APA

Nielsen, K., Randall, R., & Christensen, K. B. (2017). Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815589050

Vancouver

Nielsen K, Randall R, Christensen KB. Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2017 Apr 1;11(2):223-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815589050

Author

Nielsen, Karina ; Randall, Raymond ; Christensen, Karl B. / Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study. In: Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 223-247.

Bibtex

@article{b23c6409fe1d4ad193a30ac0e7807bf7,
title = "Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation?: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study",
abstract = "A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.",
author = "Karina Nielsen and Raymond Randall and Christensen, {Karl B.}",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1558689815589050",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "223--247",
journal = "Journal of Mixed Methods Research",
issn = "1558-6898",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation?

T2 - A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study

AU - Nielsen, Karina

AU - Randall, Raymond

AU - Christensen, Karl B.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.

AB - A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.

U2 - 10.1177/1558689815589050

DO - 10.1177/1558689815589050

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 223

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

JF - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

SN - 1558-6898

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 195961122