A Social Relations Model of need supportiveness
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
A Social Relations Model of need supportiveness. / Øverup, Camilla S.; Brunson, Julie A.; Mehta, Paras D.
In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 94, 104142, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A Social Relations Model of need supportiveness
AU - Øverup, Camilla S.
AU - Brunson, Julie A.
AU - Mehta, Paras D.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Basic need fulfillment has important implications for optimal growth and development and may be derived through receiving need support from others. Thus far, research has primarily focused on single-person ratings of (perceptions of) need supportiveness. Thus, it is unclear whether perceptions of need supportiveness are dyadically specific and reciprocal and to what extent need supportiveness may be trait-based. In the current study, sorority and fraternity members (N = 117, ethnically diverse, 78% male) completed self-ratings and other-ratings of perceptions of need supportiveness using a round-robin design. Data was analyzed according to the Social Relations Model. We found that people tended to consistently see others as, and be seen by others as, need supportive (or not). These perceptions were related to self-reported need supportiveness, suggesting that people may have perceptual biases, and there was self-other agreement in terms of need supportiveness. These findings suggest that need supportiveness may represent an individual difference and not just a dyadic construct. Moreover, those that rated themselves as need supportive were also seen by others as need supportive, providing some support for the validity of self-report measures of need supportiveness.
AB - Basic need fulfillment has important implications for optimal growth and development and may be derived through receiving need support from others. Thus far, research has primarily focused on single-person ratings of (perceptions of) need supportiveness. Thus, it is unclear whether perceptions of need supportiveness are dyadically specific and reciprocal and to what extent need supportiveness may be trait-based. In the current study, sorority and fraternity members (N = 117, ethnically diverse, 78% male) completed self-ratings and other-ratings of perceptions of need supportiveness using a round-robin design. Data was analyzed according to the Social Relations Model. We found that people tended to consistently see others as, and be seen by others as, need supportive (or not). These perceptions were related to self-reported need supportiveness, suggesting that people may have perceptual biases, and there was self-other agreement in terms of need supportiveness. These findings suggest that need supportiveness may represent an individual difference and not just a dyadic construct. Moreover, those that rated themselves as need supportive were also seen by others as need supportive, providing some support for the validity of self-report measures of need supportiveness.
KW - Social Relations Model
KW - Self-determination theory
KW - Self-report
KW - Need supportiveness
KW - SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
KW - AUTONOMY SUPPORT
KW - WELL
KW - STUDENTS
KW - FULFILLMENT
KW - ATTACHMENT
KW - SIMILARITY
KW - MOTIVATION
KW - ACCURACY
KW - GENDER
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104142
DO - 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104142
M3 - Journal article
VL - 94
JO - Journal of Research in Personality
JF - Journal of Research in Personality
SN - 0092-6566
M1 - 104142
ER -
ID: 281595344