Arm-to-arm variation when evaluating neuromuscular block: an analysis of the precision and the bias and agreement between arms when using mechanomyography or acceleromyography
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Studies comparing acceleromyography and mechanomyography indicate that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. However, it is uncertain to what extent differences in precision between the methods and the naturally occurring arm-to-arm variation have influenced the results of these studies. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to examine the precision and the arm-to-arm variation, when the same method is used on both of the arms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Volume | 105 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 310-317 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISSN | 0007-0912 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
- Acceleration, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Androstanols, Anesthesia Recovery Period, Bias (Epidemiology), Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Myography, Neuromuscular Blockade, Neuromuscular Junction, Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
Research areas
ID: 33142979