Child Care Center Hand Hygiene Programs' Cost-Effectiveness in Preventing Respiratory Infections
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Child Care Center Hand Hygiene Programs' Cost-Effectiveness in Preventing Respiratory Infections. / Azor-Martinez, Ernestina; Garcia-Mochon, Leticia; Lopez-Lacort, Monica; Marie Strizzi, Jenna; Javier Munoz-Vico, Francisco; Pilar Jimenez-Lorente, Carmen; Amparo Fernandez-Campos, Maria; Bueno-Rebollo, Cristina; del Castillo-Aguas, Guadalupe; Vicent Balaguer-Martinez, Josep; Gimenez-Sanchez, Francisco.
In: Pediatrics, Vol. 148, No. 6, 2021052496, 2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Child Care Center Hand Hygiene Programs' Cost-Effectiveness in Preventing Respiratory Infections
AU - Azor-Martinez, Ernestina
AU - Garcia-Mochon, Leticia
AU - Lopez-Lacort, Monica
AU - Marie Strizzi, Jenna
AU - Javier Munoz-Vico, Francisco
AU - Pilar Jimenez-Lorente, Carmen
AU - Amparo Fernandez-Campos, Maria
AU - Bueno-Rebollo, Cristina
AU - del Castillo-Aguas, Guadalupe
AU - Vicent Balaguer-Martinez, Josep
AU - Gimenez-Sanchez, Francisco
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that a hand hygiene program, including hand sanitizer and educational measures, for day care center (DCC) staff, children, and parents was more effective than a soap-and-water program, with initial observation, in preventing respiratory infections (RIs) in children attending DCCs. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of these programs in preventing RIs.METHODS: A cluster, randomized, controlled and open study of 911 children aged 0 to 3 years, attending 24 DCCs in Almeria. Two intervention groups of DCC-families performed educational measures and hand hygiene, one with soap-and-water (SWG) and another with hand sanitizer (HSG). The control group (CG) followed usual hand-washing procedures. RI episodes, including symptoms, treatments, medical contacts, complementary analyses, and DCC absenteeism days, were reported by parents. A Bayesian cost-effectiveness model was developed.RESULTS: There were 5201 RI episodes registered. The adjusted mean societal costs of RIs per child per study period were CG: (sic)522.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 437.10 to 622.46); HSG: (sic)374.53 (95% CI: 314.90 to 443.07); SWG: (sic)494.51 (95% CI: 419.21 to 585.27). The indirect costs constituted between 35.7% to 43.6% of the total costs. Children belonging to the HSG had an average of 1.39 fewer RI episodes than the CG and 0.93 less than the SWG. It represents a saving of societal cost mean per child per study period of (sic)147.72 and (sic)119.15, respectively. The HSG intervention was dominant versus SWG and CG.CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene programs that include hand sanitizer and educational measures for DCC staff, children, and parents are more effective and cost less than a program with soap and water and initial observation in children attending DCCs.
AB - BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that a hand hygiene program, including hand sanitizer and educational measures, for day care center (DCC) staff, children, and parents was more effective than a soap-and-water program, with initial observation, in preventing respiratory infections (RIs) in children attending DCCs. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of these programs in preventing RIs.METHODS: A cluster, randomized, controlled and open study of 911 children aged 0 to 3 years, attending 24 DCCs in Almeria. Two intervention groups of DCC-families performed educational measures and hand hygiene, one with soap-and-water (SWG) and another with hand sanitizer (HSG). The control group (CG) followed usual hand-washing procedures. RI episodes, including symptoms, treatments, medical contacts, complementary analyses, and DCC absenteeism days, were reported by parents. A Bayesian cost-effectiveness model was developed.RESULTS: There were 5201 RI episodes registered. The adjusted mean societal costs of RIs per child per study period were CG: (sic)522.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 437.10 to 622.46); HSG: (sic)374.53 (95% CI: 314.90 to 443.07); SWG: (sic)494.51 (95% CI: 419.21 to 585.27). The indirect costs constituted between 35.7% to 43.6% of the total costs. Children belonging to the HSG had an average of 1.39 fewer RI episodes than the CG and 0.93 less than the SWG. It represents a saving of societal cost mean per child per study period of (sic)147.72 and (sic)119.15, respectively. The HSG intervention was dominant versus SWG and CG.CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene programs that include hand sanitizer and educational measures for DCC staff, children, and parents are more effective and cost less than a program with soap and water and initial observation in children attending DCCs.
KW - ECONOMIC-EVALUATION
KW - DISEASE
KW - INTERVENTIONS
KW - ATTENDANCE
KW - SETTINGS
KW - ABSENCE
KW - BURDEN
KW - IMPACT
KW - RISKS
KW - HOME
U2 - 10.1542/peds.2021-052496
DO - 10.1542/peds.2021-052496
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 34814193
VL - 148
JO - Pediatrics
JF - Pediatrics
SN - 0031-4005
IS - 6
M1 - 2021052496
ER -
ID: 298238011